REITs' High Capital Costs Reflect Their Interest Rate Exposure

By Howard Simons  AUG 30, 2013 11:00 AM

The question of "which REITs?" has a fairly simple answer: All of them.

 


Every now and then, the planets align and someone from the usual crowd gets some free publicity by finding this portentous. As it happens, some financial risks are starting to align, and I thought it would be in the interest of the general public to sound the general alarm.
 
I took a look on Monday at which industry groups were most exposed to higher long-term rates.  The list, unsurprisingly, was dominated by REITs, utilities, and a smattering of consumer staples.  A parallel analysis of which industry groups are exposed to higher short-term interest rates is much sparser as we have been in a low- and suppressed short-term interest rate environment for so long that these rates have lapsed as a meaningful factor.
 
This last point is a risk in itself: While we are cautioned that past performance does not predict future results, all data analysis must be based on available numbers from the past if for no other reason than the fact that future data are so difficult to obtain.  Mortgage-derivative models did not assess the risk of nationwide declines in residential real estate properly as no such data sample existed after the 1930s.  When the various systemic-risk mavens created by Dodd-Frank gather, they should consider this point…but the betting here is that they will not.
 
Cost of Capital

Now let’s revisit an analysis from December 2011 on the weighted-average cost of capital (WACC) for both economic sectors and for industry groups within the financial sector.  WACC includes the costs of firms’ debt, equity, and preferred stock.  The relationship between WACC, profitability, and returns is not a simple and direct one; staid utility and consumer staples firms can have both a low WACC and then get clobbered in a rising-rate environment, or firms with a high WACC in the technology or energy sectors can have a high WACC as investors demand a higher return for their perceived risk.
 
The alignment of WACCs for sectors is roughly what we should expect. Utilities, telecommunications, and consumer staples all have WACCs below financials’ 7.19%.  The WACC of the Russell 3000 (INDEXRUSSELL:RUA) of 8.47% forms the internal Y-axis.



Now let’s split the financial sector into its groups.  As was the case in December 2011, the large banks that proved themselves quite dangerous to the populace have WACCs below the sector’s average.  The perception of a government safety net works wonders.  The list of above-average WACCs is dominated by REITs and real estate-related groups.



Thus the same stocks with the greatest exposure to both higher long- and short-term interest rates also are penalized with a greater-than-sector-average WACC.  The question of “which REITs?” has a fairly simple answer: All of them.  REITs had a tremendous run from the March 2009 low; the iShares US Real Estate ETF (NYSEARCA:IYR) has returned more than 244% from the March 2009 low versus 165% for the Standard & Poor’s 500 Depository Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY) .That performance was based on free money and the yield-chasing response thereto.  All good things come to an end.
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.