Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

What if Facebook Picked a Different Ticker?


Studies show that pronounceable and "clever" stock tickers do better historically.


One of this year's biggest Wall Street stories has been the breathtaking decline of Facebook (FB) following its May initial public offering. Simply put, the social media darling went public at $38 and is now trading around $19.25 -- a 49.3% plunge.

There is no denying that investors have a myriad of concerns about Facebook. Chief among those concerns is how the company is going to increase revenue and become a major player in mobile applications. Said differently, chances are sellers would have gotten around to beating up the stock at some point.

Maybe Facebook could have gotten off to a better start and kept the sellers at bay for a little while by doing something simple, such as picking a different ticker other than "FB." It might sound wacky, but there is evidence to support the notion that stocks with pronounceable tickers do perform well.

According to the Wall Street Journal, Princeton's Adam Alter and Daniel Oppenheimer looked at nearly 800 symbols that debuted on the New York Stock Exchange and the American Stock Exchange between 1990 and 2004 and divided them according to whether their symbol was pronounceable. They found investing $1,000 in the pronounceable stocks at the start of their first day of trading would have made you $85.35 more in that day than investing in unpronounceable ones.

Another study by Pomona College finance professor Gary Smith was cited in the Journal article. Smith's study focused on the longer term performances of stocks with clever tickers. The result: From 1984 to 2004, a portfolio of stocks people considered the cleverest returned 23.6% compounded annually, compared with 12.3% for a hypothetical index of all NYSE and Nasdaq stocks, the Journal reported.

Clearly, investing solely on the basis of ticker alone is a lot like going to the track and betting on a horse just because one likes the colors of the horse's silks. Said differently, no one in his or her right mind should be buying a stock based on ticker alone.

< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos