Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.
Charts: Should Investors Favor Small- or Large-Cap Stocks?
And how should market-watchers read the strong divergence between stock indices?
Howard L. Simons     

One of the problems involved in discussing the performance differentials between large- and small-capitalization stocks is the temptation to get a cheap laugh from the "size matters" description. I refuse to do that, just as I refused back in December 2012 when I noted the most important factor for relative performance was the bull/bear state of the stock market and not long-term interest rates or the state of the dollar.
 
Let's update that analysis in light of the strong divergence between indices such as the large-capitalization S&P 100 (INDEXSP:SP100) and the small-capitalization S&P 600 (INDEXSP:SP600). The analysis would not be materially different if I used the Russell 1000 (INDEXRUSSELL:RUI) and Russell 2000 (INDEXRUSSELL:RUT) indices, accessible via ETFs such as the iShares Russell 1000 Index (NYSEARCA:IWB) and iShares Russell 2000 Index (NYSEARCA:IWM). As I write, the S&P 100 and S&P BSE Small-Cap Index (INDEXBOM:BSE-SMLCAP) have returned 1.65% and -4.36% year-to-date, respectively.
 
As before, let's note some important distinctions between large- and small-capitalization issues. First, the large-capitalization issues have a significant advantage created by capitalization-weighted index funds such as the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY). Second, small-capitalization issues generally have higher price/earnings ratios, lower dividend yields, and greater realized volatility. Investors have to pay more for these stocks, receive less back in the form of dividends, and have to tolerate greater price swings.

Finally, you can explain the business model of an ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) or a Merck (NYSE:MRK) while holding a lit match; doing this while explaining assorted cloud-based schemes to sell genetic-based pharmaceuticals on a social network yet to make a dime would result in someone's burned fingers: yours.
 
Relative Performance Maps

The two charts below depict the three-month total return differential between the OEX and the SML as a function of three-month total returns on the iShares S&P 1500 Index Fund ETF (NYSEARCA:ITOT) and either 7-10 year Treasuries or the Bloomberg correlation-weighted dollar index. OEX outperformance is depicted with green bubbles, SML outperformance is depicted with red bubbles; the diameter of the bubbles corresponds to the absolute magnitude of the performance differential. The last datum used is highlighted in turquoise.
 
The first chart below confirms the relationship between OEX outperformance and long-term interest rates. As the stock market shifts into a bearish phase and long-term interest rates decline, investors flee into the perceived safety of larger-capitalization issues. 


Click to enlarge

The next chart replaces 7-10 year Treasury returns with changes in the dollar. As the market shifts into a bearish phase and the dollar strengthens, large-capitalization issues outperform.
 


Click to enlarge

Where does this leave us at present? In both cases, either a general downturn in the broad market or a continuation of the 2014 trading range will maintain OEX outperformance. A continuation of the 7-10 year rally in Treasuries will favor OEX outpeformance as well, and as this rally seems to be associated with the current trading range in equities, that's sort of a twofer assessment. The dollar is far more problematic as it has been stuck in a three-year trading range and shows no strong predilection in either direction. A stronger greenback favors OEX outperformance and vice versa.
 
So long as stocks remain in a defensively oriented trading range, the OEX will outperform the SML.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

More From Howard L. Simons
Charts: Should Investors Favor Small- or Large-Cap Stocks?
And how should market-watchers read the strong divergence between stock indices?
Howard L. Simons     

One of the problems involved in discussing the performance differentials between large- and small-capitalization stocks is the temptation to get a cheap laugh from the "size matters" description. I refuse to do that, just as I refused back in December 2012 when I noted the most important factor for relative performance was the bull/bear state of the stock market and not long-term interest rates or the state of the dollar.
 
Let's update that analysis in light of the strong divergence between indices such as the large-capitalization S&P 100 (INDEXSP:SP100) and the small-capitalization S&P 600 (INDEXSP:SP600). The analysis would not be materially different if I used the Russell 1000 (INDEXRUSSELL:RUI) and Russell 2000 (INDEXRUSSELL:RUT) indices, accessible via ETFs such as the iShares Russell 1000 Index (NYSEARCA:IWB) and iShares Russell 2000 Index (NYSEARCA:IWM). As I write, the S&P 100 and S&P BSE Small-Cap Index (INDEXBOM:BSE-SMLCAP) have returned 1.65% and -4.36% year-to-date, respectively.
 
As before, let's note some important distinctions between large- and small-capitalization issues. First, the large-capitalization issues have a significant advantage created by capitalization-weighted index funds such as the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY). Second, small-capitalization issues generally have higher price/earnings ratios, lower dividend yields, and greater realized volatility. Investors have to pay more for these stocks, receive less back in the form of dividends, and have to tolerate greater price swings.

Finally, you can explain the business model of an ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) or a Merck (NYSE:MRK) while holding a lit match; doing this while explaining assorted cloud-based schemes to sell genetic-based pharmaceuticals on a social network yet to make a dime would result in someone's burned fingers: yours.
 
Relative Performance Maps

The two charts below depict the three-month total return differential between the OEX and the SML as a function of three-month total returns on the iShares S&P 1500 Index Fund ETF (NYSEARCA:ITOT) and either 7-10 year Treasuries or the Bloomberg correlation-weighted dollar index. OEX outperformance is depicted with green bubbles, SML outperformance is depicted with red bubbles; the diameter of the bubbles corresponds to the absolute magnitude of the performance differential. The last datum used is highlighted in turquoise.
 
The first chart below confirms the relationship between OEX outperformance and long-term interest rates. As the stock market shifts into a bearish phase and long-term interest rates decline, investors flee into the perceived safety of larger-capitalization issues. 


Click to enlarge

The next chart replaces 7-10 year Treasury returns with changes in the dollar. As the market shifts into a bearish phase and the dollar strengthens, large-capitalization issues outperform.
 


Click to enlarge

Where does this leave us at present? In both cases, either a general downturn in the broad market or a continuation of the 2014 trading range will maintain OEX outperformance. A continuation of the 7-10 year rally in Treasuries will favor OEX outpeformance as well, and as this rally seems to be associated with the current trading range in equities, that's sort of a twofer assessment. The dollar is far more problematic as it has been stuck in a three-year trading range and shows no strong predilection in either direction. A stronger greenback favors OEX outperformance and vice versa.
 
So long as stocks remain in a defensively oriented trading range, the OEX will outperform the SML.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

More From Howard L. Simons
Daily Recap
Charts: Should Investors Favor Small- or Large-Cap Stocks?
And how should market-watchers read the strong divergence between stock indices?
Howard L. Simons     

One of the problems involved in discussing the performance differentials between large- and small-capitalization stocks is the temptation to get a cheap laugh from the "size matters" description. I refuse to do that, just as I refused back in December 2012 when I noted the most important factor for relative performance was the bull/bear state of the stock market and not long-term interest rates or the state of the dollar.
 
Let's update that analysis in light of the strong divergence between indices such as the large-capitalization S&P 100 (INDEXSP:SP100) and the small-capitalization S&P 600 (INDEXSP:SP600). The analysis would not be materially different if I used the Russell 1000 (INDEXRUSSELL:RUI) and Russell 2000 (INDEXRUSSELL:RUT) indices, accessible via ETFs such as the iShares Russell 1000 Index (NYSEARCA:IWB) and iShares Russell 2000 Index (NYSEARCA:IWM). As I write, the S&P 100 and S&P BSE Small-Cap Index (INDEXBOM:BSE-SMLCAP) have returned 1.65% and -4.36% year-to-date, respectively.
 
As before, let's note some important distinctions between large- and small-capitalization issues. First, the large-capitalization issues have a significant advantage created by capitalization-weighted index funds such as the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (NYSEARCA:SPY). Second, small-capitalization issues generally have higher price/earnings ratios, lower dividend yields, and greater realized volatility. Investors have to pay more for these stocks, receive less back in the form of dividends, and have to tolerate greater price swings.

Finally, you can explain the business model of an ExxonMobil (NYSE:XOM) or a Merck (NYSE:MRK) while holding a lit match; doing this while explaining assorted cloud-based schemes to sell genetic-based pharmaceuticals on a social network yet to make a dime would result in someone's burned fingers: yours.
 
Relative Performance Maps

The two charts below depict the three-month total return differential between the OEX and the SML as a function of three-month total returns on the iShares S&P 1500 Index Fund ETF (NYSEARCA:ITOT) and either 7-10 year Treasuries or the Bloomberg correlation-weighted dollar index. OEX outperformance is depicted with green bubbles, SML outperformance is depicted with red bubbles; the diameter of the bubbles corresponds to the absolute magnitude of the performance differential. The last datum used is highlighted in turquoise.
 
The first chart below confirms the relationship between OEX outperformance and long-term interest rates. As the stock market shifts into a bearish phase and long-term interest rates decline, investors flee into the perceived safety of larger-capitalization issues. 


Click to enlarge

The next chart replaces 7-10 year Treasury returns with changes in the dollar. As the market shifts into a bearish phase and the dollar strengthens, large-capitalization issues outperform.
 


Click to enlarge

Where does this leave us at present? In both cases, either a general downturn in the broad market or a continuation of the 2014 trading range will maintain OEX outperformance. A continuation of the 7-10 year rally in Treasuries will favor OEX outpeformance as well, and as this rally seems to be associated with the current trading range in equities, that's sort of a twofer assessment. The dollar is far more problematic as it has been stuck in a three-year trading range and shows no strong predilection in either direction. A stronger greenback favors OEX outperformance and vice versa.
 
So long as stocks remain in a defensively oriented trading range, the OEX will outperform the SML.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

More From Howard L. Simons
EDITOR'S PICKS
 
WHAT'S POPULAR