Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.
Industrial Metals' Decline Not a Negative Indicator
The message from the past three years could not be clearer: Equities have no problem rising while industrial metals are falling.
Howard L. Simons     

I've always had the greatest respect for prosaic markets, those quiet little workhorses with little speculative content. However, one of the consequences of modern finance is that some trader's tentacles get stuck in every gearbox and manage to turn nonfinancial assets into financial ones. Just try to find a tentacle remover at Home Depot (NYSE:HD). It used to be possible to analyze copper in terms of physical supply and demand, but now you have to contend with Chinese firms that used it as collateral for a loan and managed to turn the red metal into red ink in the process.

Should you panic about the decline in the Dow Jones-UBS industrial metals index, which consists of copper, aluminum, nickel, and zinc? On one level, the answer is: only if you wish to amuse whoever's looking at you by taking a few selfies and posting them all over Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) or other social media sites unfamiliar to your aged correspondent. On a more serious level, the only times that declining industrial metals have been a coincident (and not even a leading) indicator of equity returns have been recessions. If the global economy is weak and metals demand declines, both stocks and industrial metals decline.

Three Years of Divergence

Let's map the total returns for the DJ-UBS industrial metals index against the MSCI Barra total return indices for the US and the World Ex-US on a common logarithmic scale. Two things should be apparent immediately. First, the World Ex-US and the industrial metals indices tracked each other very closely between the Federal Reserve's first declaration of war on deflation in May 2003 and January 2012; the r-squared, or percentage of variance explained, was 0.932.

Second, industrial metals started to turn lower at the end of April 2011, almost three years ago. Their total return since then has been -41.2%. Total returns for the US and the World Ex-US have been 50.2 and 9.48%, respectively. Oh, and while I'm tossing negative news for industrial metals around like the Acme anvil of cartoon fame, the Producer Price Index has advanced 4.46% since then. Anyone who thinks something called "commodities" is an automatic hedge against inflation has some homework to do.


The message from the past three years could not be clearer: Equities have no problem rising while industrial metals are falling. The betas, or relative variances, of US and World Ex-US equities to industrial metals since April 2011 have been -0.888 and -0.282, respectively. To say "stocks up, metals down" is not some Pollyannaish perma-bull nonsense; to say otherwise is simply unstudied prattle. The declines in industrial metals have been a logical consequence of large-scale mining investments made during the previous decade intersecting with the inevitable slowdown in China's construction boom. If, however, China implodes and we have a world recession or worse, all bets are off.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

More From Howard L. Simons
Industrial Metals' Decline Not a Negative Indicator
The message from the past three years could not be clearer: Equities have no problem rising while industrial metals are falling.
Howard L. Simons     

I've always had the greatest respect for prosaic markets, those quiet little workhorses with little speculative content. However, one of the consequences of modern finance is that some trader's tentacles get stuck in every gearbox and manage to turn nonfinancial assets into financial ones. Just try to find a tentacle remover at Home Depot (NYSE:HD). It used to be possible to analyze copper in terms of physical supply and demand, but now you have to contend with Chinese firms that used it as collateral for a loan and managed to turn the red metal into red ink in the process.

Should you panic about the decline in the Dow Jones-UBS industrial metals index, which consists of copper, aluminum, nickel, and zinc? On one level, the answer is: only if you wish to amuse whoever's looking at you by taking a few selfies and posting them all over Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) or other social media sites unfamiliar to your aged correspondent. On a more serious level, the only times that declining industrial metals have been a coincident (and not even a leading) indicator of equity returns have been recessions. If the global economy is weak and metals demand declines, both stocks and industrial metals decline.

Three Years of Divergence

Let's map the total returns for the DJ-UBS industrial metals index against the MSCI Barra total return indices for the US and the World Ex-US on a common logarithmic scale. Two things should be apparent immediately. First, the World Ex-US and the industrial metals indices tracked each other very closely between the Federal Reserve's first declaration of war on deflation in May 2003 and January 2012; the r-squared, or percentage of variance explained, was 0.932.

Second, industrial metals started to turn lower at the end of April 2011, almost three years ago. Their total return since then has been -41.2%. Total returns for the US and the World Ex-US have been 50.2 and 9.48%, respectively. Oh, and while I'm tossing negative news for industrial metals around like the Acme anvil of cartoon fame, the Producer Price Index has advanced 4.46% since then. Anyone who thinks something called "commodities" is an automatic hedge against inflation has some homework to do.


The message from the past three years could not be clearer: Equities have no problem rising while industrial metals are falling. The betas, or relative variances, of US and World Ex-US equities to industrial metals since April 2011 have been -0.888 and -0.282, respectively. To say "stocks up, metals down" is not some Pollyannaish perma-bull nonsense; to say otherwise is simply unstudied prattle. The declines in industrial metals have been a logical consequence of large-scale mining investments made during the previous decade intersecting with the inevitable slowdown in China's construction boom. If, however, China implodes and we have a world recession or worse, all bets are off.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

More From Howard L. Simons
Daily Recap
Industrial Metals' Decline Not a Negative Indicator
The message from the past three years could not be clearer: Equities have no problem rising while industrial metals are falling.
Howard L. Simons     

I've always had the greatest respect for prosaic markets, those quiet little workhorses with little speculative content. However, one of the consequences of modern finance is that some trader's tentacles get stuck in every gearbox and manage to turn nonfinancial assets into financial ones. Just try to find a tentacle remover at Home Depot (NYSE:HD). It used to be possible to analyze copper in terms of physical supply and demand, but now you have to contend with Chinese firms that used it as collateral for a loan and managed to turn the red metal into red ink in the process.

Should you panic about the decline in the Dow Jones-UBS industrial metals index, which consists of copper, aluminum, nickel, and zinc? On one level, the answer is: only if you wish to amuse whoever's looking at you by taking a few selfies and posting them all over Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) or other social media sites unfamiliar to your aged correspondent. On a more serious level, the only times that declining industrial metals have been a coincident (and not even a leading) indicator of equity returns have been recessions. If the global economy is weak and metals demand declines, both stocks and industrial metals decline.

Three Years of Divergence

Let's map the total returns for the DJ-UBS industrial metals index against the MSCI Barra total return indices for the US and the World Ex-US on a common logarithmic scale. Two things should be apparent immediately. First, the World Ex-US and the industrial metals indices tracked each other very closely between the Federal Reserve's first declaration of war on deflation in May 2003 and January 2012; the r-squared, or percentage of variance explained, was 0.932.

Second, industrial metals started to turn lower at the end of April 2011, almost three years ago. Their total return since then has been -41.2%. Total returns for the US and the World Ex-US have been 50.2 and 9.48%, respectively. Oh, and while I'm tossing negative news for industrial metals around like the Acme anvil of cartoon fame, the Producer Price Index has advanced 4.46% since then. Anyone who thinks something called "commodities" is an automatic hedge against inflation has some homework to do.


The message from the past three years could not be clearer: Equities have no problem rising while industrial metals are falling. The betas, or relative variances, of US and World Ex-US equities to industrial metals since April 2011 have been -0.888 and -0.282, respectively. To say "stocks up, metals down" is not some Pollyannaish perma-bull nonsense; to say otherwise is simply unstudied prattle. The declines in industrial metals have been a logical consequence of large-scale mining investments made during the previous decade intersecting with the inevitable slowdown in China's construction boom. If, however, China implodes and we have a world recession or worse, all bets are off.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

More From Howard L. Simons
EDITOR'S PICKS
 
WHAT'S POPULAR