VSTOXX Meets Fear and Regret
The volatility market has moved in accordance with the cumulative and time-adjusted fear and regret of investors.
Briefly, anchoring is the phenomenon wherein we measure our current state against some reference point, such as a last new high in personal wealth. As time heals all wounds except the last one, some accounting for the time passed between that last new high and the present is required; this is the "regret" portion of the title. Similarly, we get a sense of fear and then relief from the various downdrafts into the spike lows so characteristic of stock market trading patterns. That exhilaration attenuates over time as well.
If we combine these two phenomena into a simple model incorporating time-adjusted proximity to the last new high and the most recent low, we can create an index de-anchored from price levels as to where the VSTOXX, VIX, or other volatility indices should be trading. The history of this index against the VSTOXX itself is displayed below.
Too High or Low?
The model’s index can be subtracted from the actual VSTOXX to create a residual value. If we map this against the Euro STOXX 50 index (NYSEARCA:FEZ) that underlies the VSTOXX, we can see how closely or poorly it matches history. As of last Thursday, the last datum used, the residual of -0.92 was a mere 0.112 standard deviations below fair value. This suggests the VSTOXX was neither too low – the “complacency” abhorred by so many for reasons only a few can articulate – nor too high, inviting sales of volatility either in the form of option straddles or VSTOXX futures. The VSTOXX market has moved in accordance with the cumulative and time-adjusted fear and regret of investors.
The history above invites some narration. Please note the very large positive residuals during the 2008-2009 financial crisis; volatility jumped well over fair value during this period as the market started pricing in the risk of ruin for financial markets. Similar periods of overvaluation occurred during the May 2010 Greek default and European Central Bank rescue, and again during the September-October 2011 Spanish/Italian sovereign debt crises leading to the expansion of global currency swap lines in November 2011.
It works both ways, too: Virtually the entire period since the July 2012 “whatever it takes” statement by Mario Draghi has been spent with undervaluation. This is an accurate reflection of financial suppression and indeed a metaphor for an entire age in financial markets.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.