PMR: Another Retail ETF Worth Considering
The PowerShares Retail Portfolio has been around for over seven years and has about $50 million in assets under management.
This certainly is the time of year to talk about consumer discretionary and retail ETFs. US consumers, the driving force behind 70% of this country's GDP, appear poised to flex his and her muscles this holiday shopping season.
While this is the "most wonderful time of the year" and a critical one at that for retail ETFs, it is easy for some retail ETFs to slip through the cracks as the conversation regarding these funds is usually dominated by the SPDR S&P Retail ETF (NYSEARCA:XRT). By virtue of an impressive year-to-date performance, the Market Vectors Retail ETF (NYSEARCA:RTH) has crept into the conversation as well, but there are more than just two retail ETFs worth considering.
One of those ETFs is the semi-obscure PowerShares Retail Portfolio (NYSEARCA:PMR). The PowerShares Retail Portfolio has been around for over seven years and has about $50 million in assets under management. Combine that AUM total with average daily volume less than 23,000 shares and ETF AUM/volume critics, of which there are plenty, practically have built-in excuses to gloss over PMR.
PMR's lineup is best described as a potpourri of retail names. The fund features exposure to stocks ranging from Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) to Whole Foods (NASDAQ:WFM) to Costco (NASDAQ:COST) to Gap (NYSE:GPS).
What separates PMR from a fund such as RTH is small-cap exposure. Approximately 42% of PMR's weight is devoted to small caps, both growth and value names. And speaking of allocations, PMR is validated as a holiday shopping play because nearly two-thirds of its weight is devoted to discretionary stocks. Over 28% of the fund's weight goes to staples names with a small allocation being devoted to industrials.
Overall, nearly 61% of PMR's weight is allocated to growth stocks. That translates to a somewhat elevated valuation. PMR has a price-to-earnings ratio of 16.4 and a price-to-book ratio of nearly 2.8, according to PowerShares data. That compares to a P/E/ of 15.35 and a price-to-book ratio of 2.45 for XRT. In its favor, PMR's constituents have an average return on equity of almost 24%.
Based on pure performance, PMR is running third to RTH and XRT on a year-to-date basis, but that does not mean the fund is not worthy of consideration. PMR's weight, though not excessive, to small-caps indicates the fund has utility in a risk-on environment. Should the market experience a legitimate January Effect in early 2013, the scenario under which small-caps lead an early year market rally, PMR has the potential to outperform other retail ETFs.
To that end, PMR's market capitalization and sector weightings do imply some added beta, but that also means the spoils of owning this fund can be rich in a cooperative market setting. Consider paring PMR with the more conservative RTH to cover all retail bases. Should the recent ebullience seen on Black Friday carry over throughout the holiday shopping season, investors will be able to start the new year out on the right note by taking gains in both ETFs.
Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by The ETF Professor.
Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:
Feds Targeting SAC Capital's Steve Cohen?
October Durable Goods Orders Beat Estimates
Deal on Greek Aid Finally Reached
Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.