Four ETFs Staring at the Death Cross
These ETFs are emitting strong bearish signals that could be worrisome.
There are hundreds of technical scenarios that chartists swear by. Head and shoulders formations, double tops, triple bottoms, and scores of others, but one of the most efficacious is the death cross. Explaining the death cross to a six-year-old is easy. It's the situation where a security's 50-day moving average crosses below its 200-day line.
While no signal is 100% accurate, the death cross is at least simple and frequently effective. I took a look at five death cross ETFs on March 6 and the average loss absorbed by the group since then is over 16%.
With that performance and the market's downward gyrations in recent weeks, I thought it would be a good idea to revisit the death cross well. Some of the funds featured here have already done the death cross dance while others are getting close.
Guggenheim S&P Global Dividend Opportunities Index ETF (LVL): LVL, which is yielding over 5%, is heavy on financial services stocks (24.3% of the fund's weight), but that exposure should be tempered by an almost 24% to telecommunications issues. To be fair, most of LVL's financial holdings are high yielding mortgage REITs such as American Capital Agency (AGNC) and Annaly Mortgage (NLY), not traditional money center bank stocks.
On the other hand, it's easy to see why LVL recently entered death cross territory. Five eurozone nations combine for one-third of the fund's country weight.
iShares MSCI France Index Fund (EWQ): Speaking of the eurozone, I present EWQ, the ETF tracking the region's second-largest economy. There's not much of a good news story with EWQ these days. Off 9.3% in the past month, the only France-specific ETF is in a position where the death cross hasn't happened yet, but it's really a matter of "when" not "if."
EWQ's largest holding, French oil giant Total (TOT), has a compelling yield and valuation at the moment, but only that stock directly is probably a better idea than using EWQ as a proxy for Europe's third-largest oil company.
iShares MSCI EMU Index Fund (EZU): EZU's dalliance with death cross territory could be confirmed any day now and like LVL and EWQ, the eurozone is the culprit, though that should be obvious by the fund's name (EMU stands for European Monetary Union). France and Germany account for almost two-thirds of the ETF's weight, but the real problem is a 17.6% allocation to financials and an almost 17% combined weight to Spain and Italy. As TradeWithPete.com notes, EZU's October low is the key technical area as a break there coupled with that area turning into resistance would be a bearish sign.
Guggenheim S&P Equal Weight Energy ETF (RYE): In more sanguine market environments, it's not surprising to see equal-weight ETFs outperform their cap-weighted counterparts. The market is far from sanguine these days and not only has RYE recently trailed the Energy Select Sector SPDR (XLE), the Guggenheim fund recently earned a death cross. To be fair, XLE isn't far behind. Any potential RYE has to correct its death cross in the near-term hinges on its ability to hold support at $55.
Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by The ETF Professor.
Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter