Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Comparing Sector ETFs and ETNs

By

Exchange traded funds (ETFs) are a perfect tool for asset allocation. But be careful -- ETNs are lumped in the same category, but can be very different in terms of holdings, fees, and liquidity.

PrintPRINT
General Commodity Funds

The contenders are iPath DJ-UBS Commodity ETN (NYSEARCA:DJP), PowerShares DB Commodity (NYSEARCA:DBC), and iShares S&P GSCI (NYSEARCA:GSG):



Winner: PowerShares. It is the best performer of the three this year and sports the most daily volume. Energy is a good place to be going forward.

As an ETN instead of an ETF, owners of the iPath product run the risk of Barclays defaulting but I feel good about Barclays - LIBOR scandal notwithstanding. It is one of the three largest banks in the United Kingdom. Furthermore, it "stole" Lehman Brothers' assets out of bankruptcy for a song and did not require a bailout from the British government during the 2008-2009 financial crisis (unlike many others). Lastly, an ETN does not have any tracking error (other than management fees) because it does not own actual commodities but is simply a contractual agreement to return the index.

China Funds

The contenders are SPDR S&P China (NYSEARCA:GXC), iShares FTSE/Xinhua China 25 (NYSEARCA:FXI), and Guggenheim China All-Cap (NYSEARCA:YAO):



Winner: SPDR. Its trading volume is low, but I like its superior performance, cheap expense ratio, and its lower exposure to financial services.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
PrintPRINT

Busy? Subscribe to our free newsletter!

Submit
 

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE