Satyajit Das: Return of the Age of Gold
In economic chaos, war, or collapse, gold reappears, reasserting it grip on humanity.
Any investor who purchased the gold sold by the financial astute UK Chancellor would have made a substantial profit.
But gold is not itself a great store of value, at least over long time periods.
Gold bugs excitedly speculate about gold prices reaching $2,300. But even at that price gold would merely match its January 1980 peak price after adjusting for inflation; in other words, the holder had earned nothing on the investment over almost 30 years!
The gold price adjusted for inflation is the same as the price in the middle ages. Dylan Grice of Société Générale summed up the case for gold as a store of value in the following terms:
The gold price can also be very volatile. In late 2011, after reaching record levels, the gold price fell nearly 20% very quickly.
Warren Buffet observed that if stock investors are driven by optimism about prospects then “what motivates most gold purchasers is their belief that the ranks of the fearful will grow.” Harry “Rabbit” Angstrom, the central character in John Updike’s 1970s novels about American suburban life, spends $11,000 on the purchase of 30 gold Kruggerrands (a South African minted gold coin). Rabbit explains the purchase to his wife: “The beauty of gold is, it loves bad news.”
In economic chaos, war or collapse, gold reappears, reasserting it grip on humanity.
Back to the Future
The revival of interest in gold is also underpinned by debate of a return to the gold standard. Advocates as varied as Libertarian US presidential candidate Ron Paul and the Islamic Liberation Party (Hizb ut-Tahrir) have argued that the gold standard is a solution to the deep problems of the global economy.
The gold standard, it is argued, would foster economic stability and prosperity, primarily by creating price stability, fixed exchange rates, and placing limits government deficit spending as well as trade imbalances. It will also limit credit driven boom bust cycles through constraints on the supply of money.
The gold standard, opponents argue, would limit the flexibility of governments and central banks in managing economies, restricting the ability to adjust money supply, government budgets, and exchange rates. Opponents also point to the inflexibility of the gold standard which may have contributed to the severity and length of the Great Depression.
A return to the gold standard would also confer a natural financial advantage to countries that product gold, such as the US, China, Russia, Australia, and South Africa. Geopolitical considerations and global competition make this unlikely.
There are also limits to supply. In all human history, only about 160,000 to 170,000 metric tons of gold have ever being extracted. Annual production is somewhere around 2,400-28,000 tons of gold.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.