Foreign Investors: Saviors of Vietnamese Banks, Vietnam ETF?
The country's banks are seeing soaring debt levels and a government crackdown on corruption.
Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by The ETF Professor, Benzinga Staff Writer.
Vietnam's banking sector, the Southeast Asian nation's most controversial industry group and one of the largest sector components in the Market Vectors Vietnam ETF (NYSEARCA:VNM), is the primary reason VNM and investor confidence in the country sank during the second and third quarters of 2012.
Amid soaring bad debt levels and a government crackdown on corruption that resulted in the arrests of multiple Vietnamese banking luminaries, foreign investors had little reason to embrace Vietnam bank stocks. VNM suffered as a result, plunging from near $21 in May 2012 to around $15 in November.
VNM's fortunes have reversed for the better as the ETF has surged almost 24% in the past month. One big reason: the banking sector. The development of a debt asset management company to resolve bad bank debt has been helped lift VNM, which devotes about 45% of its weight to financial services stocks.
So has a new government outlook on foreign investment in Vietnamese banks. As is the case with so many large financial institutions in various developing markets, the state controls Vietnam's most recognizable banks. Apparently realizing that this can be a turn-off for foreign investors, the Vietnamese central bank is mulling an increase in foreign ownership limits in the country's so-called bad banks.
The State Bank of Vietnam is considering boosting foreign ownership limits in Vietnamese banks, which currently cannot exceed 30% of the bank's charter capital, according to the Asia News Network.
Central bank Governor Nguyen Van Binh said the central bank has submitted a proposal to policymakers in Hanoi that would lift the limit on ownership of a single foreign strategic shareholder in any other bank from 15% to 20%, Asia News reported.
The news comes at a critical time. Vietnam saw its foreign direct investment total slump 15.3% last year to just over $13 billion.
Manufacturing, real estate, and retail were the sectors that were on the receiving end of the bulk of FDI directed to Vietnam. Banks, not so much.
Noteworthy is the fact that some foreign banks saw opportunity in Vietnam in advance of Binh's announcement regarding the push for relaxed restrictions on foreign ownership of stakes in the country's banks.
In late December, Japan's Mitsubishi UFJ, that country's largest bank, announced a $743 million deal to acquire 20% of Vietnam Joint Stock Commercial Bank for Industry and Trade, or VietinBank. The State Bank of Vietnam will remain the majority owner of VietinBank, but the deal shows Vietnam is warming to outsiders owning large slices of its financial services firms.
In the Asian News Network interview, Binh noted, "The most fundamental factors [for attracting capital] are still the business efficiency of companies, economic stability, and investor psychology." With Vietnam, those points ring especially true given the country's reputation for corruption and a long-slumping equity market.
On the upside, should Vietnam proceed with opening its banks to increased foreign investment, the bull case for VNM becomes all the more compelling. As it is, the ETF carries a a P/E ratio of 9.29, a price-to-book ratio of just 1.15, and a dividend yield of 3.33%.
Those numbers indicate VNM is inexpensive relative to the broader emerging markets universe as represented by the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Index Fund (NYSEARCA:EEM). VNM's dividend yield is far higher than EEM's and the former's price-to-book ratio is less than half of the latter's. EEM trades with a P/E of 17.31, according to iShares data.
Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:
Why Is NVIDIA Building a Portable Game Machine?
Investing in Breakfast Stocks
Fertile Market Yields Big Movers -- But Don't Chase
Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter