Consumer Staples Stocks Looking Pricey
Not only has the group been lagging the broader market for a couple of months now, it is also richly valued.
Editor's Note: This content was originally published on Benzinga.com by The ETF Professor, Benzinga Staff Writer.
Usually a beacon of predictability and stability, particularly in volatile market environments, the consumer staples sector thrived in 2012. The bad new is, not only has the group been lagging the broader market for a couple of months now, it is also richly valued.
In downgrading his view of the sector to Neutral from Overweight, iShares Global Chief Investment Strategist Russ Koesterich calls the premium staples stocks currently trade at "extreme."
"As people generally need to buy household items like toothpaste and soap even when the economy is weak, consumer staples stocks typically trade at a premium due to the stability of their earnings streams," wrote Koesterich in a note. "But today's premium looks extreme. Consumer staples is now the most expensive sector globally, trading at 3.4x price to book, nearly double the level of the global benchmark."
Adding to the potential disappointments for investors embracing staples stocks and ETFs at currently frothy levels is earnings growth. As in estimates for staples' earnings growth do not jibe with the lofty valuations the sector now sports.
"Despite their rich valuation, earnings growth estimates for the sector are the third lowest of the 10 economic sectors," wrote Koesterich.
Staples stocks are prized for low betas, dependable dividends and predictable earnings, but even with those favorable catalysts, the statistics support Koesterich's view that the group is richly valued.
Take the Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR (NYSEARCA:XLP). With over $5.6 billion in assets under management, XLP is the largest staples ETF by that metric. An ETF that devotes 42 percent of its combined weight to stodgy Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG), Philip Morris (NYSE:PM), Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) and Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) trades with a P/E ratio of almost 17 and a price-to-book value of 3.33, according to State Street data.
Conversely, the Technology Select Sector SPDR (NYSEARCA:XLK), an ETF that allocates almost 23 percent of its combined weight to Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) and Google (NASDAQ:GOOG), has a P/E ratio of just over 13.
Pricey staples names is not just a U.S. phenomenon. The iShares S&P Global Consumer Staples Sector Index Fund (NYSEARCA:KXI) devotes almost half its weight to companies that are not based in the U.S., including Nestle (PINK:NSRGY), British American Tobacco and Diageo (NYSE:DEO).
While KXI keeps with the staples tradition of being a low-beta offering (beta of 0.63), the ETF is another example of a richly value staples play. For the privilege of owning the aforementioned international stocks along with Procter & Gamble, PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP) and Altria (NYSE:MO), among others, investors will have to deal with KXI's P/E ratio of almost 20 and a price-to-book ratio of 5.86.
That is pricier than the iShares S&P Global Technology Sector Index Fund (NYSEARCA:IXN), where Apple and Google combine for over 20 percent, and the iShares S&P Global Energy Sector Index Fund (NYSEARCA:IXC). Koesterich has Overweight ratings on the global energy and technology sectors.
Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:
Boeing Pain Continues As Battery Investigations Commence
Is RIM Going to Be Acquired?
Earnings Preview: Google, Motorola Acquisitions to Drive Explosive Sales Growth
Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.