Has China Re-Pegged the Yuan?
Japan wanted to weaken the yen, and China gave the nod in return for the US acquiescing to a cessation of the yuan's revaluation.
The world’s major currencies have been on a bit of a roller coaster ride since Japan decided that the way to enrich its citizens was to create inflation at home and reduce purchasing power for imported goods. Consider the following high-low ranges for selected currencies since November 14, 2012:
- Euro: 0 - 7.1% for a 7.1% range;
- Canadian dollar: -5.0 - 2.1%; for a 7.1% range;
- British pound: -5.8 - 2.8%; for an 8.6% range;
- Australian dollar: 0.3 - 2.1%; for a 1.8% range;
- Japanese yen: -20 - 0% for a 20% range; and
- Chinese yuan: -0.4 - .2% for a 0.6% range.
We can get similar evidence of flat-lining from the implied volatility of three-month yuan forwards; that range has been 1.345% to 1.975%. The euro’s volatility range over the same period has been 7.095% to 9.375%. I should add the yuan’s implied volatility has been on the order of one order of magnitude lower than those of other major currencies since 2006; the demand for price insurance against a currency whose movements are controlled so tightly is justifiably absent.
All Interests Are Served
Everyone is free to believe in Santa Claus, the Tooth Fairy, governments acting in the interest of the mythical Little Guy, or things happening by happenstance in the currency market. I choose otherwise. The facts fit the conclusion that a grand currency deal took place last November. Japan wanted to weaken the yen, and China gave the nod in return for the US acquiescing to a cessation of the yuan’s revaluation. Everyone wanted to see the euro firm, and lo and behold many of the freshly printed yen went into European fixed-income markets. Everyone could be pleased with their handiwork.
In addition, China has regarded Japan’s decision to allow the yen to firm in the 1980s as their first step on the road to their two Lost Decades. They would be more than willing to help finance the portion of the US deficit not going straight onto the Federal Reserve’s balance sheet to achieve this aim. The US in turn welcomed a cheaper yuan to offset the dent in consumer income resulting from the cessation of the 2% FICA tax holiday; ask our friends at Wal-Mart (NYSE:WMT) whether their customers felt that pay cut in the light of rising inflation.
At the end of all this, the 40-year era following the collapse of the Bretton Woods fixed exchange-rate system between 1971 and 1973, an era inaptly named the floating exchange-rate era, has come to a close not with a bang but with a whimper. We are living in its replacement, an ad hoc patchwork of closed-door arrangements defying the first of Woodrow Wilson’s Fourteen Points, paraphrased as open covenants openly arrived at, “…after which there shall be no private international understandings of any kind…”
This is what happens when the world’s primary issuer of reserve currency also is the world’s largest debtor, and when the world’s largest creditor will not allow its currency to be fully convertible. All of these little side deals will work, if we define “work” as producing nominal financial market gains, until the minute they fail in a catastrophic accident.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.