Refiners Would Benefit From Misguided Strategic Oil Reserve Release
Big players in the West, and possibly in Asia, would see a boost from such a move, but it could go unnoticed by Russia.
- Suffered the greatest military losses in World War I
- Had a revolution and bloody civil war before the Bolsheviks finally consolidated power
- Endured the horrors of collectivization and Stalin's engineered famine in Ukraine
- Endured Stalin's reign of terror
- Suffered the greatest losses known for one country in any war during World War II
- Endured the expenses of the Cold War and the economic stagnation produced by 45 years of Communism
- Suffered 10 years of kleptocracy and the loss of an empire following the collapse of the Soviet Union
Strategic Petroleum Reserve Release
Now some are proposing to release crude oil from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR) as a way of "punishing" Russia, with the idea that this would lower global crude-oil prices. Maybe; it would depend on whether this short-term supply increase was negated by supply reductions from other producers. The release of 500,000 to 700,000 barrels per day from salt domes along the US Gulf Coast into the Gulf Coast refining system should back out an equivalent amount of waterborne imports, but exporters could choose to fight for market share by offering price discounts.
I noted in December 2013 refiners on the Gulf and East Coast have been enjoying a period of strong profitability by converting rising US crude-oil production into exports of distillate fuel oil to Europe and Brazil; surplus gasoline had been put into storage. As distillate production capacity is near its maximum, additional crude-oil supply would fall in price and lead to expanded refining margins.
If exporters competed with price discounts on the Gulf Coast, southward-flowing barrels from North Dakota and Canada would move into storage at Cushing, Oklahoma, and lead to expanded refining margins in the US mid-continent. If exporters cut production by some amount less than the SPR release, refineries along the Gulf Coast will be the beneficiary.
The effects on the crude oil market would depend in part on the mix of crude oil released from the SPR. Rising US production has displaced imports of low-sulfur crude oil from exporters such as Nigeria and Angola; further displacement would likely affect Canadian exports. If the barrels released are high-sulfur, imports from Iraq, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia would be displaced with those barrels likely to move into South Asian and East Asian refining markets. The actual revenue effect on Russian crude-oil exports to refining centers in the Mediterranean and Northwest Europe would depend on the release mix and other exporters' responses.
Regardless, the S&P refiners group, home to Valero (NYSE:VLO), Tesoro (NYSE:TSO), Phillips 66 (NYSE:PSX), and Marathon (NYSE:MPC) should continue to outperform as their crude oil acquisition costs will remain under control while their throughput remains high. An SPR release would be a gift to them and quite possibly to Asian refiners if those Persian Gulf exports swing eastward. The effect on Russia will be minimal and, given their history, something they may or may not notice.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter