Sell-Off Cuts Deep: What's Next for Global Financial Markets?
Investors around the world are on the edge of their seats.
More than $1.8 trillion of global equity market value was lost yesterday; the sell-off cut deep, it cut hard, and it cut fast. The question on everybody's lips is: Will it cut more?
We dove deep yesterday in an attempt to navigate our forward path, mapping levels of lore, catalysts du jour, and perhaps most importantly, the psychology surrounding the issues at hand.
To top-line a topic that is anything but a quick at-a-glance, I will offer the following observations:
- Everyone seemingly pointed to Ben Bernanke and his tapering agenda; I would offer that China—and Chinese interbank lending rates, or Chibor—was an equal or larger catalyst for the sell-off. Some liken this Asian juncture to the early stages of our stateside situation in 2007; it's too early to tell if that will play through—there are many moving parts—but the global marketplace began to discount that, in my view. It should be noted that the Chinese government took steps to alleviate fears overnight, which is helping to shape market psychology.
- Today is expiration Friday (index options expire on the open; single stock options expire on the close), which pushed the tape around yesterday (expiration influences tend to manifest, through increased volatility, in the days prior to the actual expiry). It felt like the tape tried to pin S&P (INDEXSP:.INX) 1600—where there is outsized open interest—and once that gave way, lower strikes served as a price magnet (this dynamic will disappear after stocks open this morning).
- The longstanding S&P uptrend—in place since November, generating 25% of upside return—broke with vigor yesterday, shifting the technical landscape in one fell swoop. In the absence of clarity—it's difficult to have too much confidence in the system formerly known as capitalism—traders and investors alike embrace metrics that are definable. If the trend is your friend, this progression warrants attention.
Gold, and the rest of the commodity complex, took it on the chin. This is a continuation of a preexisting trend, but the price action was notable nonetheless. I offered my humble take on the forward direction of gold; in short, if monetary policy was going to drive gold higher, it would have done so long ago. Opinions aside, we would be wise to note the correlation between gold and the S&P, per the chart below.
- Social mood continues to sour; this wasn't a "Thursday topic" but it is relevant to this conversation as social mood and risk appetites shape financial markets. With social unrest sweeping streets the world over—and that was with the stateside tape near all-time highs—the mindset of the masses will be put to the test as risk assets decline, even if the wealth gap represents a slimming margin of society.
Following an outsized move, such as the one we had yesterday, the tape tends to probe that direction at least once the following session. As such, while the futures are green, I would expect a downside test, from which we will monitor our tells for guidance. Yes, we're short-term oversold—the Dow Jones Industrial Average (INDEXDJX:.DJI) lost +/-600 points, the S&P lost +/-70 points and the NASDAQ (INDEXNASDAQ:.IXIC) lost +/-100 points since the FOMC—but we would be wise to remember that we remain +/-5% from recent and in some cases all-time highs.
I've been trading around a short bias, with 50% of a full position in December SPY (NYSEARCA:SPY) puts against a few long positions, including Facebook Inc (NASDAQ:FB) with a tight stop. Rather than cover my S&P short, I gently nibbled on my longs into the close (full disclosure: I'm actively trading them both ways). Water pistol to my head, S&P 1500, which is +/- a 10% correction from recent highs, remains viable, perhaps probable, although I've rolled down my stops on the S&P (to the other side of the trend line) in an effort to manage risk, rather than chase reward.
Lots to discuss in real-time; I’ll see YOU over on the Buzz.
- I'm keeping a close eye on the Macau gambling names; if China is in fact a banking crisis—or the perception thereof permeates—stocks like Wynn Resorts, Limited (NASDAQ:WYNN), Las Vegas Sands Corp. (NYSE:LVS) and Melco Crown Entertainment LTD (ADR) (NASDAQ:MPEL) could have the feel of some cold dice.
Follow Todd and over 30 professional traders as they share their ideas in real-time with a FREE 14 day trial to Buzz & Banter.
Todd Harrison is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Minyanville. Prior to his current role, Mr. Harrison was President and head trader at a $400 million dollar New York-based hedge fund. Todd welcomes your comments and/or feedback at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.