Billionaires Behaving Badly: Lynda and Stewart Resnick
Are the owners of Fiji water and Pom juice practicing clever marketing? Or is there something more nefarious going on?
But that’s precisely the allegation levied against Fiji Water owners Lynda and Stewart Resnick whose bottled water company, in 2009, comprised roughly 20 percent of exports and three percent of GDP, $3,900 per capita of a country seized by an oppressive military junta. Fiji’s population, according to Amnesty International, “is living in fear as a result of draconian measures implemented by the regime” where the Resnicks enjoy nearly exclusive access to the third world country’s aquifer, tax-free status and untold millions in profits.
And if the military dictatorship isn’t in the back pocket of the Resnicks, it sure acts like it is. When a Mother Jones reporter was in the country writing an expose on Fiji Water, she was snatched up by police from an internet cafe and detained. During her interrogation, an officer taunted and threatened her: "I'd hate to see a young lady like you go into a jail full of men" and "You know what happened to women during the 2000 coup, don't you?" He accused her of working for a competing bottled water company. “It would be good to come here and try to take away Fiji Water's business, wouldn't it?"
There may be Fiji Water everywhere but there’s not a free drop to drink in the country, the Mother Jones journalist reported. With a water supply so unsanitary it causes typhoid outbreaks, the people are forced to buy Fiji Water or risk a host of medical problems. And even though the little square bottles don’t need to be shipped halfway across the planet, the company charges its impoverished locals almost as much as US consumers, 90 cents a pint, for the privilege of using its own natural resource.
In an attempt to offset negative publicity surrounding its role in the country’s colonial injustices, Fiji Water has established a village trust and makes charitable contributions to benefit various aspects of island life from education to public works. And although the company keeps actual dollar amounts close to the vest, “court proceedings indicate that it has agreed to donate .15 percent of its Fijian operation's net revenues; a company official testified that the total was about $100,000 in 2007.” The following year, Fiji Water spent $10 million on marketing alone.
That budget was put to strategic use to counter criticism from environmentalists who rail against the wasteful practices inherent in the bottle water industry. The company’s green-washing campaign, literally called “Fiji Green,” boasted the use of biofuels and diesel generators at the Fiji plant and promised to become a carbon-negative brand. The website claims, “We are the first and only major bottled water company to make this commitment, under which we will continue to offset 120% of our emissions.”
These kinds of eco-conscious efforts by water bottlers never fail to draw the ire of conservationists like the Rainforest Action Network’s Michael Brune who said, “Bottled water is a business that is fundamentally, inherently and inalterably unconscionable. No side deals to protect forests or combat global warming can offset that reality.” And what Fiji Water neglects to disclose is that the plastic used in its bottles is imported from China.
Despite their costly PR efforts, the Resnicks still manage find themselves in hot water -- most recently from their foray into the business of peddling pomegranate juice. As the founders of POM Wonderful, the couple has been slapped with a complaint from the Federal Trade Commission for false and deceptive advertising. Federal regulators aren’t buying the company’s extravagant health claims of the "Rubies in the Orchard," as dubbed by Lynda in her marketing book, including preventing heart disease, prostate cancer and erectile dysfunction. Unless Pom Wonderful comes up with valid scientific evidence to substantiate its claims to the Food and Drug Administration, the company will be forced to remove them from all advertising materials.
A statement issued by POM Wonderful in response to the complaint accused the government of “wasting taxpayer resources to persecute the pomegranate."
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.