Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

What Will Be the Next Coca Cola?


It may be years before Coke is ever toppled, but there are some brands making fast market gains despite an overall industry slump.



The USDA's Dietary Guidelines for Americans seem to be making a dent at last, if the latest Beverage Digest dispatch from the cola wars is any indication. For the sixth year in a row, total volume of sales for the carbonated soft drinks industry was down, although total moneys made – thanks to higher prices – were up from last year. Although there are more Americans with each passing year, they drink fewer sodas per capita. And when they do drink it, increasingly it's diet.

The Coca-Cola Co. (KO) is still holding onto 42 percent of the domestic market, far outpacing Pepsi's (PEP) 29.3 percent and Dr. Pepper Snapple's (DPS) 16.7. Nor are Coke's century-old rivals likely to make up the shortfall overseas, where Coke already has a stranglehold. It's No. 1 in China although that country makes many of its own soft drinks. (And the situation is even stranger, or sadder, in Africa. Read Soft Drinks -- A Weapon Against Malnutrition in Africa?, here.)

To knock Coke off its pedestal, a new soda would have to have Coke's aggressive reach. For now, only China and India have the population and only China the reach to present a viable competitor -- and they both love Coke.

While the brand seems fairly entrenched as the best-selling soft drink ever, world without end, amen -- its sales are nevertheless declining while much smaller sectors' are growing. Four of the top 10 soda brands by market share in 2010 were diet sodas, with regular Pepsi tumbling far enough to usher the plateaued Diet Coke forward as the second-most popular soda in the US.

The growth winners are Diet Mountain Dew and Diet Dr. Pepper and their high-fructose counterparts, as well as Sprite and Fanta. This change suggests not only that consumers are easing up on the HFCS in some areas, but that they're looking for flavor. Specifically, according to Beverage Digest, "citrus is gaining."

Also gaining the market share that Coke and Pepsi are losing is National Beverage Co. (FIZZ) which distributes Shasta and other off-brand sodas, and Hansen Natural (HANS), which makes its own sodas with cane sugar and natural flavors.

National Beverage uses what it calls "regional share dynamics" to target certain flavors to certain regions and demographics. For the moment, this means it sells very sweet sodas like Genuine Faygo Dee-licious Redpop in places where they call it "pop," and LaCroix sparkling water in places with redwoods.

Theoretically, though, it can expand this concept to include copying -- or buying -- not only various regional syrups but drinks with potential mass appeal; borderline-medicinal drinks like kombucha soft drinks, for example, or the Chinese herbal tea soda Wong Lo Kat.

Hansen is also poised to take increasing advantage of a gradual shift away from junk food, or at least toward one or two ingredients that seem to justify the rest of the drink: sugar rather than HFCS, natural citrus flavors, real fruit and herbs, and healthy additives like plant sterols or water-soluble vitamins. If Hansen's could, in short, find a way to mass-produce artisanal soda brands like Jones and Reed's, it could conceivably continue to gain market ground.

But oust Coke? No time soon.

Lasting through April 15, 100% of the donations made to The Ruby Peck Foundation for Children's Education will be channeled to the children of Japan as they attempt to find their footing following this natural disaster; and to kick off this drive, we'll pledge $5000 to get it started. Please do what you can, as it will add up, and thanks.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos