Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

The 'Great Derecho' Exposed Old Grids

By

The power is back up (for the most part) after the storm that swept down on the mid-Atlantic states in early July. Now utilities are going to have to calculate what it cost them.

PrintPRINT

The Great Derecho of 2012 knocked out power to 4.3 million people over 10 Midwest and Middle Atlantic states. The toll in human lives and property damage has yet to be fully counted.

Hurricanes typically take days to form at sea. That gives first responders, utilities and government agencies in threatened areas time to prepare for damage control. In contrast, the Great Derecho came with hurricane-force winds virtually without warning. Recovery plans had to be made on the fly, in some cases with emergency communications networks out of service.

The longer the outage, the greater the cost incurred by utilities. The storm's intensity is a clear warning we've entered a period of greater extremes, with increased stresses on basic systems, particularly electricity.

Electric utility companies' performance following storms is increasingly under scrutiny from customers, and by extension regulators. Utilities are heavily insured for property damage and in many cases against loss of load as well. Instead, the exposure lies in the perceived effectiveness of a company's response-and how that perception affects relations with the regulators who set their rates.

Last autumn, for example, a destructive winter storm triggered outages throughout Northeast Utilities' (NU) New England territory, nearly derailing its merger with neighboring NSTAR Electric (NSARO). Connecticut Attorney General George Jepsen is still pushing state regulators to levy huge financial penalties. Meanwhile, National Grid (NGG) lost its contract to manage the Long Island Power Authority system, largely because of its poor storm response.

Public perception of utilities' performance in the wake of the Great Derecho of 2012 is still forming. In the crosshairs are regional utilities American Electric Power (AEP), Dominion Resources (D), Exelon (EXC), First Energy (FE), and PEPCO Holdings (POM).

So far, Dominion Resources' response seems to be drawing the best reviews. Not only did the company set and later meet clear goals for restoring power to customers, but it also provided an extraordinary amount of information on its efforts.

Conversely, the press and politicians are already slamming into PEPCO Holdings, which serves the District of Columbia and large parts of Maryland, Delaware, and New Jersey. DC Mayor Vincent Gray declared himself "fed up" with PEPCO's performance.

The company has asked Maryland regulators to delay their decision on its request for a 4% rate hike, almost surely because it fears denial in the wake of its criticized storm response. PEPCO also has a 5% rate hike on file in the District.

Denying PEPCO these rate hikes-and perhaps tacking on penalties such as a denial of storm cost recovery-would prove politically popular. The problem is, defunding a utility boosts its capital costs and inhibits investment. When that happens, shareholders are the first to suffer. Consequently, it pays for investors to be wary of utilities with tough regulatory environments.

PEPCO, for example, hasn't raised its dividend since early 2008, and its share price has dropped 33% over the past five years. In contrast, neighboring Dominion, which has consistently enjoyed strong relations with Virginia regulators, has boosted its payout five times in five years by a total of almost 50%, returning nearly 55% over that time.

To grow, utilities must earn a fair return on their system investment from regulators. And nothing affects utility-regulator relations as strongly as a company's performance during power outages. Investors ignore this reality at their own risk.


Editor's Note: This article was written by Roger Conrad of Personal Finance.

Below, find some more great investing and trading content from MoneyShow:


The Week Ahead: Can Stocks Ignore the World's Problems?
By Tom Aspray

A Good Way to Play Copper's Big Bounce
By Andy Crowder


Making B2B Commerce Sexy
By Michael Cintolo

Pumping Its Way to Profits
By Benjamin Shepherd


Twitter: @TopProsTopPicks
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE