Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Apple's iPhone 5S Could Eliminate the Problematic Home Button


Removing the home button could prevent the need for future repairs.

Editor's Note: This content was originally published on by Louis Bedigian.

Apple (NASDAQ:AAPL) is experimenting with an idea that could eliminate the need for the iPhone's home button, preventing future repairs for the device.

The home button is highly regarded as one of the iPhone's most problematic components. A Google (NASDAQ:GOOG) search for "iPhone broken home button" retrieved 24.5 million results versus a search for "iPhone broken antenna," which retrieved only 1.6 million results.

The issue is so common that there are literally hundreds (if not thousands) of pages dedicated to helping users replace or repair their damaged home buttons.

Apple could prevent these problems -- and eliminate another moving part -- by replacing the home button with a flat, touch-sensitive area that performed the same action.

According to a Cult of Mac translation of a report by Taiwanese tech publication TechNews, supply chain sources claim that the next iPhone will include a "sapphire crystal capacitive touch home button that incorporates a new fingerprint sensor."

The sapphire crystal would be used to prevent the likelihood that scratches will tarnish the fingerprint sensor, which could prevent it from functioning properly.

When building the iPhone 5, Apple reportedly used sapphire crystals to protect the rear camera from a barrage of scratches. That feature was an important part of maintaining the iPhone's ability to take quality, scratch-free pictures.

From a cost perspective, it is unknown how the sapphire crystal and accompanying fingerprint sensor might increase Apple's expenditures.

Apple has been faced with diminishing margins, as every iPhone costs more to produce than the last. At the same time, investors are pushing for Apple to increase its margins -- a task that has proved to be all but impossible.

Take the iPad Mini, for example. It is significantly cheaper than the full-size iPad and has been less profitable than its predecessors. In the long run, however, the iPad Mini is expected to sell more units than the full-size model ever could. Thus, the Mini is the more valuable product -- but investors might not see it that way.

By building a cheaper iPhone, Apple likely has a similar goal: to sell more smartphones than ever before. If its margins are reduced, however, investors may have a difficult time coping with Apple's strategy.

While the iPhone 5S or iPhone 6 may include the fingerprint sensor, the lower-cost iPhone is likely to stick to the familiar home button.

Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:

Insider Monkey Says TechCrunch Got It Wrong -- Microsoft Not Buying Nook

Twitter: @Benzinga

Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos