Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

ETF Showdown: Not Now, Maybe Later


Energy and emerging market focused funds are feeling it first.

It's widely known that energy stocks aren't the place to be these. Even the blue chips are getting hammered, a fact highlighted by a decline of almost 6% in the past month for the Energy Select SPDR (XLE).

It makes sense. West Texas Intermediate oil futures are down about 15% since the start of May; Brent crude, the global benchmark, is deep in the red as well. Likewise, it's no surprise that the combination of emerging markets and oil has proven toxic at best. Just look at the iShares MSCI Brazil Index Fund (EWZ) and the Market Vectors Russia ETF (RSX). Those funds are down 16.4% and 17.6% in the past month, respectively. Obviously these two emerging markets are clearly levered to the oil trade, and as such, EWZ and RSX have been down with commodities. On that note, one can only imagine how ugly things could be of an ETF that is a combination energy sector/emerging markets fund.

Two such funds exist: the EGShares Energy GEMS ETF (OGEM) and its newer rival, the iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Energy Sector Capped Index Fund (EMEY). So we have the making of what could be an ugly "ETF Showdown," but one that's packed with potential as well.

The iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Energy Sector Capped Index Fund came to market in February as a direct competitor to OGEM, which celebrated its third birthday earlier this week. OGEM, home to 30 stocks and an 0.85% annual expense ratio, has $11.2 million in assets under management. EMEY has 49 stocks and $7.8 million in AUM while charging 0.69%.

Neither fund is particularly liquid, though OGEM's average daily volume of almost 3,550 shares easily trounces EMEY's ADV, which isn't even in the triple-digits.

Both OGEM and EMEY are have the usual suspects of emerging markets energy firms (meaning Russia's Gazprom, Brazil's Petrobras (PBR) and Chinese oil giants PetroChina (PTR) and CNOOC (CEO) figure prominently in both funds.

At the country level, Russia, the world's largest non-OPEC oil producer, accounts for almost 35% of OGEM's weight. China and Brazil combine for another 25%. Within EMEY, that trio represents two-thirds of the fund's country allocation.

As has been previously noted, exposure to Petrobras isn't a good things these days. Brazil's state-owned oil company has been the worst-performing major oil stock in the world for over two years and currently resides below $20. To that end, our firm doesn't like OGEM's 7.1% to problematic Petrobras, but more concerning is the iShares fund's 14.5% allocation to two different Petrobras securities.

Another point in OGEM's favor is a larger weight to Colombia's Ecopetrol (EC), arguably the antithesis of Petrobras when it comes to state-run oil companies. Ecopetrol is the ninth-largest holding in both ETFs, but its weight in OGEM is 4.36% compared to 3.24% in EMEY.

Regarding performance, well, it's about as ugly as one would expect. Since EMEY came to market in February, the fund has tumbled 22%, but OGEM is down more than 21% over the same time. In the past month, OGEM is off 14.3% compared to 12.4% for EMEY.

The cold, harsh reality is that the current market environment is neither conducive to owning oil stocks nor to owning emerging markets equities and ETFs, so this isn't the time to put either OGEM or EMEY in a portfolio. That time will come again and when it does, our preference would be OGEM on the basis of its lower exposure to Petrobras and Brazil and its superior liquidity.

Editor's Note: This content was originally published on by The ETF Professor.

Below, find some more great ETF and market content from Benzinga:

What to Watch For: Next Week's Data Docket

ETFs: The Better Way to Play Facebook?

View From the Street: Thoughts From Credit Suisse Chief Economist Dr. Neal Soss

Twitter: @Benzinga

Benzinga Pro covers this and all market news in real time. Get your free trial here.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos