Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.

Apple and Google's Weaknesses Summarized in 250 Words

Print comment Post Comments
Buzz was a flop. Safari can't grow. And neither Google or Apple seem to understand why.

How can Google and Apple -- two companies who have set standards, cornered markets, and mastered their trades -- be so adept in certain areas and completely outmatched by a three-person startup in another?

Google design manager Nadav Savio answered that question by eloquently summarizing the biggest weaknesses of the two companies in a mere 250 words.

It's been said that Google doesn't get 'social' and, though I think that is vastly overstated, there is truth there. Similarly, I'd say that Apple doesn't understand the internet. Well I have a simple theory about it. There's a cliché that everyone's greatest strength is also their greatest weakness, and I believe that applies as well to organizations as to people.

Take Apple. They make amazing, holistic products and services and one of their primary tools is control. Fanatical, centralized control. Control over the design, over the hardware, over the experience. And that's exactly the opposite of the internet, which is about decentralization and messy, unfiltered chaos.

Google, on the other hand, gets the internet, but has trouble with humans. And I'd say it's not so much because it's an engineering-heavy organization or that Google doesn't know how to have fun (both reasons I've seen stated publicly). I think it's that one of Google's biggest strengths is in search, which is largely about things like precision and recall, about stitching the chaos of the internet into some semblance of order. But social interactions happen in the variance, in the messy spaces that seem meaningless. Much social meaning is carried by phatic communication and that is exactly opposite to what Google does, which is to optimize signal vs. noise, looking for the meaning and discarding the meaningless.

Presumably, we can find the undoing of other organizations in their strengths. What, for example, is Microsoft really, really good at? Or Facebook?
POSITION:  No positions in stocks mentioned.