Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Politics And Regulation
Trading And Investing
How To Trade
How To Invest
Wall Of Worry
Hoofy & Boo
From The Buzz & Banter
MV Education center
t3 live subscriptions
Clear Channel Agrees to Performance Royalties
June 6, 2012 03:39 PM
LOUD AND CLEAR
If you hadn’t noticed, the music industry is in a bit of a rough patch. Plummeting album sales and the lower profit margins of digital purchases from outlets like
) make earning a living as an artist harder than it’s been since the invention of the Victrola. A new agreement between the nation’s largest radio conglomerate and Nashville label could be the first step in the other direction. At the very least, it represents a potential sea change in how artists are compensated for the use of their performances.
Currently, royalties for commercial airplay are based on a 1917 Supreme Court ruling that said compensation should be paid to the composer -- and thus, not the performer. That didn’t mean much in the days when music’s biggest revenue streams came from sheet music and player pianos, and commercial radio was still just a gleam in
eye. Once radio exploded, however, this was clearly a raw deal for artists. A song would become a hit because of a particular performance, but the lion’s share of the money it earned would go to the composer and publisher, an unfair system that led to further chicanery. Witness how many chartbusters of the 1950s were mysteriously “written” by unscrupulous managers and DJs.
Despite the explosion of satellite and online alternatives, terrestrial radio remains the biggest source of airplay for artists, partly due to the fact that radio retains an unfair economic advantage over its upstart brethren. The newer media have, for the most part, agreed to performance royalties that don’t burden the old-school radio outlets.
) recently announced
it would remain in the red for at least another year
, and pointed to performance royalties as one of its barriers to profit.
Clear Channel appears to be bucking this trend, or at least dipping its toe into those waters. It has
come to an agreement with the Big Machine Label Group
-- home to Taylor Swift, Tim McGraw, and other country stars -- to pay performance royalties for terrestrial radio play. The exact parameters of the deal are unclear, but why would the biggest radio company in the history of time volunteer to pay royalties?
Probably because a deal like this now could be ultimately lucrative. Clear Channel’s deal reportedly gives discounts to online radio play, thus giving an incentive to steer airplay in that direction. It’s a clear indication that they’re banking on the continued growth and expansion of Pandora-like online services. By paying a little now, Clear Channel steels themselves against a potential future where terrestrial radio goes the way of the dodo and online listening is the only game in town. It does not, however, have any contingencies for the inevitable retro piano roll fad.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
BIG MACHINE LABEL GROUP
Wall Street Journal
See All Tickers »
More From Minyanville
Trading and Investing
MV Education Center
Buzz & Banter
Cooper's Market Report
The Options Strategist
Directory of Terms
T3 Live Subscriptions
Buzz and Banter.com
Ruby Peck Foundation
Terms and Conditions
Follow Minyanville on Facebook
Follow minyanville on Twitter
Follow Minyanville on Linkedin
Subscribe to Our RSS Feed
©2017 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved