How to Capitalize Your Start-Up When Banks Say "No"
By Gary Stern Nov 27, 2009 7:50 am
Sweat equity can help get your business on track.
In September 2008, when partners Paul Rosenfeld and Tracy Grover were launching Fanminder, a text message marketing company that’s trying to appeal to six million small businesses, they didn’t even consider going to a bank for start-up capital. Rosenfeld quipped that the definition of a banker is someone who gives you an umbrella and then takes it back when it rains.
Instead of seeking capital, Fanminder, based in Mountain View, California, took two routes to launching: starting in a home office with minimal capital and then seeking to build staff through sweat equity, giving employees a slight stake of 0.1% to 0.5% ownership each, amounting to about 5% total for 25 employees.
Both partners resigned from Account Now, where Rosenfeld was head of marketing and Grover was head of products, because they thought their business model had a competitive edge and would find an audience. While Walmart (WMT) and Sears (SHLD) have used text messaging to offer promotions and entice repeat businesses, most small businesses didn’t have the resources to maintain e-mail lists, write newsletters, and oversee marketing.
“We were at the same point with text messaging that websites were in 1997,” Rosenfeld noted, adding that 77% of Americans send texts.
Raising less than $50,000 from friends and family and relying on savings, they started from home, didn’t have to buy equipment, and wanted to see if there was a market for their business. However, they needed engineers to create software, designers to build the site, and sales and marketing staff to identify customers but didn’t have the capital to pay them.
Tapping their network, the partners identified 25 people who agreed to work part-time for about 10 to 15 hours a week, usually at night, for one year without salary for miniscule ownership rights. Of course, Rosenfeld noted that dreamers can contemplate that a 1% ownership stake of a company that sells for $200 million is worth $2 million.
Ironically, most staff were working at large companies and wanted to make the most of their talents, were stay-at-home moms, or were between jobs and seeking full-time employment, rather than dreaming about making a million (or a quarter of a million) if the company ever took off.
After going live in September 2009, Fanminder has secured about 30 customers and is beginning to show signs of identifying a market.
Angel investors want to see four criteria, “a team in place, product launch, proof that the concept works, and customers,” Rosenfeld said. Because Fanminder has all four elements, its partners are seeking a $1 million dollar investment from angels to grow the business, rent an office, and hire and pay full-time staff.
Instead of seeking capital, Fanminder, based in Mountain View, California, took two routes to launching: starting in a home office with minimal capital and then seeking to build staff through sweat equity, giving employees a slight stake of 0.1% to 0.5% ownership each, amounting to about 5% total for 25 employees.
Both partners resigned from Account Now, where Rosenfeld was head of marketing and Grover was head of products, because they thought their business model had a competitive edge and would find an audience. While Walmart (WMT) and Sears (SHLD) have used text messaging to offer promotions and entice repeat businesses, most small businesses didn’t have the resources to maintain e-mail lists, write newsletters, and oversee marketing.
“We were at the same point with text messaging that websites were in 1997,” Rosenfeld noted, adding that 77% of Americans send texts.
Raising less than $50,000 from friends and family and relying on savings, they started from home, didn’t have to buy equipment, and wanted to see if there was a market for their business. However, they needed engineers to create software, designers to build the site, and sales and marketing staff to identify customers but didn’t have the capital to pay them.
Tapping their network, the partners identified 25 people who agreed to work part-time for about 10 to 15 hours a week, usually at night, for one year without salary for miniscule ownership rights. Of course, Rosenfeld noted that dreamers can contemplate that a 1% ownership stake of a company that sells for $200 million is worth $2 million.
Ironically, most staff were working at large companies and wanted to make the most of their talents, were stay-at-home moms, or were between jobs and seeking full-time employment, rather than dreaming about making a million (or a quarter of a million) if the company ever took off.
After going live in September 2009, Fanminder has secured about 30 customers and is beginning to show signs of identifying a market.
Angel investors want to see four criteria, “a team in place, product launch, proof that the concept works, and customers,” Rosenfeld said. Because Fanminder has all four elements, its partners are seeking a $1 million dollar investment from angels to grow the business, rent an office, and hire and pay full-time staff.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
(3)
Reply
2009-11-25 17:24:20
Some thoughts and an experience with sweaty equity start up
First: So it's come to this. People forced to saved money for a start up business. Are we sure that this is the American way?? Don't we all put that stuff on credit cards or something?? *grin*
Anyway, About 6 months ago, I was approached by someone organizing a sweat equity business. About our 2 or 3 meeting in and about 5-10 hours in, I started to ask specific questions about legal structure, cash input, and control. That line of questioning brought an astounding lack of response on the other party. (They were "too busy" to address the questions I raised and/or "couldn't give me" the control I was looking for.)
That lead me to the belief that this person was simply looking for free help to start her business. The goal appeared to be to avoid as much work, money outlay, and risk taking on their part while still retaining control by dancing visions of money in front of everyone else. At that point, I completely bailed on the project. It left a nasty taste in my mouth for people who come up with these structures.
Personally, I would have never worked for 10-15 hours a week for a year (520 hours or over 2 months of full time work) for a 0.1% ownership stake. I'm guessing that they probably did not get the best help under that "compensation" scheme. Also, my guess is that by the end of the year, many of the original 25 will have bailed. A year is a very long time to work for no pay *and* all the BS of office politics. It's one thing to work after work for yourself on your dreams, quite another to be working for a paltry stake in a someone else's business.
Anyway, About 6 months ago, I was approached by someone organizing a sweat equity business. About our 2 or 3 meeting in and about 5-10 hours in, I started to ask specific questions about legal structure, cash input, and control. That line of questioning brought an astounding lack of response on the other party. (They were "too busy" to address the questions I raised and/or "couldn't give me" the control I was looking for.)
That lead me to the belief that this person was simply looking for free help to start her business. The goal appeared to be to avoid as much work, money outlay, and risk taking on their part while still retaining control by dancing visions of money in front of everyone else. At that point, I completely bailed on the project. It left a nasty taste in my mouth for people who come up with these structures.
Personally, I would have never worked for 10-15 hours a week for a year (520 hours or over 2 months of full time work) for a 0.1% ownership stake. I'm guessing that they probably did not get the best help under that "compensation" scheme. Also, my guess is that by the end of the year, many of the original 25 will have bailed. A year is a very long time to work for no pay *and* all the BS of office politics. It's one thing to work after work for yourself on your dreams, quite another to be working for a paltry stake in a someone else's business.
2009-11-25 17:25:03
Some thoughts and an experience with sweaty equity start up
I wrote "sweaty equity start up" - ha, ha, ha! I slay myself.
2009-11-29 11:12:39
can you trust
the front man that makes a statement that 77% of americans text message.
This cannot possibly be accurate. Right off the bat you have all the kids less than 10 years old and folks over 65 that are not going to be testing. Perhaps he meant to say 77% of working americans with incomes over $30K or some qualifier to that extent.
They will probably have a talking sock for a spokesman soon--as work has been slow the last decade, he is willing work for sweat equity.
This cannot possibly be accurate. Right off the bat you have all the kids less than 10 years old and folks over 65 that are not going to be testing. Perhaps he meant to say 77% of working americans with incomes over $30K or some qualifier to that extent.
They will probably have a talking sock for a spokesman soon--as work has been slow the last decade, he is willing work for sweat equity.
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options. Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.
Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved

















