How a CEO's Mindset Could Guide the Fed
A long term outlook and an understanding of the business cycle would be a good place for the Federal Reserve to start.
I have recently been contemplating the divide between how investment managers and corporate CEOs think, and how to convert this understanding into economic and investment gains.
My firm believes that many investors (and all politicians) don’t really understand how a CEO thinks. This is a critical gap, as what executives' actions matter -- they control the majority of US commerce.
In this process, we use “CEO” collectively to mean chief executives of public and private companies, managing directors of non-profits, and any other leader that manages an organization that contributes to our GDP. It is an oversimplification, but these peoples' decisions can make or break an economy.
I believe that the following misunderstandings are perhaps at the root of our sluggish economy and wild financial swings. I’ve been on both sides of the equation, having spent 15 years as a CEO and seven as a financial analyst interacting with CEOs. We also talk regularly to hundreds of small business leaders in the technology space.
So how do CEOs think?
CEOs Need Stability and Visibility to Do Their Jobs
CEOs need a stable environment to plan against. However, the decisions they make usually require long cycles of investment and learning. They need to know that 3, 5, 10 years from now, some of their core assumptions will still be (primarily) accurate. That visibility makes them feel comfortable committing company resources, making acquisitions, and more importantly making hiring decisions. Hiring decisions require the highest level of comfort.
Why is it different? From a professional standpoint, hiring an employee (or group of employees) only to have to turn around and fire them is a leadership and judgment mistake, one that keeps you up at night. It can lead to the cascading effect of poor morale in both the company and with your reseller channel and/or supply chain partners. And when it’s part of a major strategy, it’s a mistake that can get you fired.
From a personal perspective, hiring even one employee is realizing that it’s not just your that person who depends on your judgment, but their family as well. Regardless of how it is often portrayed in the mainstream press/movies, putting little Timmy on food stamps is not something any CEO takes lightly. As a result, they are very careful in hiring decisions. Although one occasionally runs across the “ruthless” executive, the vast majority of those I have met are good people that care.
To the point about stability... it’s no accident that the late 1990’s was a great time for US business. A Democratic President and a Republican Congress almost insured that nothing big would happen on the political and regulatory scene. You could almost hear CEOs thinking, “Gridlock in Washington... now that’s something I can invest in.”
It’s also no accident that CEOs with international reach are investing heavily in the BRIC countries. They believe two things: First, that these countries will develop a much larger middle class over the next decade and the number of buyers of whatever they sell will multiply like rabbits. Second, by and large those countries want them there, and will therefore provide a business friendly environment.
In the US right now, it’s difficult to be certain about anything -- politically, fiscally, or regulatory. If any CEOs doubted that for a minute, the month of July set them straight.
CEOs Think That Investment Managers are Just Like Their Eight Year Old Daughter and Her Friends
Eight year olds live in a bubble of life that vacillates between giddy joy and deep unhappiness -- often in the same day/hour. Their view of long term is “what do I wear to school tomorrow” -- a far cry from the CEO’s perspective just laid out.
CEOs look at the markets and shake their heads. The markets’ perception of the future can change in days. The last few weeks are a perfect example of a manic 180-degree reversal in investor sentiment from business is great to business is horrible.
In the first quarter of 2009, when the market was reaching new lows every day, most of the investment world thought “things are just terrible”. We spoke with software ecosystem executives in February and March of that quarter who kept saying that “business is actually not that bad”. We suspect this will be the case when we talk to our channel in September.
A good CEO looks right through these swings of investor sentiment and stays focused on executing his/her plan. Putting a plan in motion and executing against that plan is not easy. It typically entails a very complex set of parts; literally, a puzzle with ten thousand pieces that has been set in motion. And it’s generally not a good idea to make sudden changes.
On the NetApp (NTAP) quarterly conference call last week, the firm's CEO summed it up (and I paraphrase), “Why would we change our plan because of two lousy weeks when the world was focused on the reality show train wreck that was Washington D.C.?”
If the crisis persists for a few quarters, or the world does indeed have another credit crunch, he will alter his plan. Though if he does, it will likely just be a tweak. Things must have really tanked in his/her market for a CEO to change plans.
Good CEOs Understand the Basics of a Successful Business Cycle
They know from experience that most recessions are caused by the normal cleansing of bad business decisions. They know that corrections in inventory are what really slow down commerce. I mention this because the majority of CEOs are looking at the world around them saying, “Where is the excess inventory?”
It’s not in my warehouse.
It’s not in my channel’s warehouse.
It’s not in my customer’s warehouse.
It’s not my payroll. (Maybe I laid off some people in 2008/2009 and decided not to hire many during this recent cycle. I certainly don’t have excess employees right now.)
It’s not in my community.
How many more construction workers can get fired?”
How many more health care workers can lose their jobs?
How many more state and local workers can they let go?
How many more federal workers will they fire (I wish).
And so on.
Where’s the excess that needs to be worked off... other than maybe in risk assets and the Federal government?
Why are the excesses of a traditional business cycle not there right now? Because CEOs treaded very carefully this time. They knew that short-term fixes don’t work. They knew “cash for clunkers” was not going to work. They knew QE2’s $600 bln over nine months was not going to work. They knew that spending “stimulus” in the form of transfer payments was not going to work.
So they moved slowly, invested overseas (if they could), and played for the long haul. Some call it “investing through a downturn”. But most have been investing in overseas growth because they don’t think the US is doing the right things to fix its problems.
Having no material excesses that need to be corrected almost guarantees that any slowdown will be shallow.
My firm believes if the average CEO could provide advice to Mr. Bernanke or our political leaders, it would be:
Whatever you do, make it a long term program. Stop “priming the pump” and start filling the tank with gas. If QE2 had been a little for a long time perhaps the outcome would not have been the roller coaster ride that brought us right back where we were this time last year. Remember, we like stability and visibility. Please give us something predictable to plan and invest against. If the markets are addicted to stimulus, take it away slowly. Rehab is a process.
Remember that its people with jobs that pay taxes. More jobs means more tax revenue. So aim your remaining bullets at things that make us want to hire US-based employees. Stop watching the birds floating in front of your eyes (envisioning the cartoon character that just got bopped on the head with a mallet), and focus on the reason we are not hiring homegrown workers.
A fast changing regulatory landscape is the opposite of stability and visibility.
Never forget that the “intelligence is at the edges”. We only have an Internet because nobody controls it. Trust in American innovation and competitiveness.
What's my point?
The current market hysteria is overdone and will be relatively short lived. Without major excesses to work off, business might change a bit at the margins due to the recent uncertainty, but projects will go on. The rest of the world will continue to grow their middle class and companies will invest to serve their needs. It’s not 2008 where the excesses that needed to be worked off were obvious.
If our leaders take some of the CEO advice outlined above, like something that encourages companies to add jobs in the US, things will get better quickly. It’s not going to be the 90’s, but it won’t be 2008/2009 either. CEOs have growth in their genes, and there is pent up desire to grow.
Technology will continue to drive the changes to how we do business and live our lives. At the heart of every piece of digital electronics is software. As Marc Andreessen wrote recently in a Wall Street Journal article: “Why software is eating the world” ... “That’s the big opportunity”. And software companies are on sale today.
The information on this website solely reflects the an= alysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial mark= ets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed b= y the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or m= embers of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to c= onstitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or= category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take a= ny action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities market= s or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisi= ons must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with = his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade= or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing o= n the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they ha= ve a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not per= mitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this w= ebsite is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's busin= ess or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing write= rs will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment= advice.
= Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.