Exxon: Applying Free Cash Flow Analysis
When examining an investment idea, review historical trends.
Editor's note: This missive is the third in a series on valuing securities (here's part 1 and part 2). Those new to financial markets can find more content with an educational bent at Minyanville's Education page. Year OCF Capex FCF 2002 21.3 11.4 9.8 2003 28.5 12.9 15.6 2004 40.6 12.0 28.6 2005 48.1 13.8 34.3 2006 49.3 15.5 33.8 2007 52.0 15.4 36.6
With a little perseverance you can get things done
Without a blind adherence that has conquered some
In a previous missive we discussed the merits of free cash flow for valuing securities. To get a feel for this concept in motion, let's take a look at a company that has been generating mammoth free cash flow, Exxon Mobil (XOM). Recall that free cash flow (FCF) equals operating cash flow (OCF) minus capital expenditures (capex).
Annual XOM Free Cash Flow ($ Billions)
You can see that XOM's operating cash flow has increased by about 150% over the past few years. During this period, capital expenditures have increased less than 50%. As a result, free cash flow has increased nearly fourfold, reaching nearly $37 billion in 2007.
This is a remarkable level of FCF--even for enterprises in the 'sweet spot' energy space. Indeed, many favorite domestic 'go to' trading names in oil and gas production, such as Apache (APA), Devon Energy (DEV) and XTO Energy (XTO) have not been consistently FCF positive throughout this same period. While operating cash flows have increased significantly for these enterprises, capital expenditures have increased commensurately, leaving less FCF than one might expect given the favorable secular winds blowing at the backs of firms in this sector.
One of the first things that I do when examining an investment idea is to review historical FCF trends (similar to what we've done above). This exercise helps me grab a toe hold on the economic value producing potential of an enterprise.
How can we use FCF info to estimate the 'fair value' of a stock? Stay tuned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter