Exxon's Activist Shareholders Fall Short
For now, chairman and CEO still one and same.
Sometimes $40 billion just isn't enough.
Yesterday, Exxon Mobil (XOM) shareholders failed to pass a measure that would have created the role of independent chairman at the world's biggest refiner. The influential Rockefeller family led the push -- as it's done for several years -- which it hoped would encourage the company to focus more on environmental concerns.
In responding to the proposal, The Wall Street Journal reports Rex Tillerson, Exxon's chairman and chief executive, said the company has a "corporate responsibility to see that the world has enough fossil fuels for its growing energy demands." He acknowledged, however, that the company needs to do more to reduce its environmental footprint.
Even though the measure garnered the support of less than 40% of shareholders, some analysts still expect Exxon to split the chairman and CEO roles in two. The measure's popularity among activist shareholders may be enough to convince the company that, in order to avoid a more serious fight, decisive action is needed.
Minyanville's Buzz and Banter -14 day FREE Trial
At issue is the disconnect between one company's legal responsibility to shareholders and its efforts to be a responsible environmental steward. Oil companies like Exxon and Chevron (CVX) regularly find themselves embroiled in conflicts over the impact of oil extraction. Pointing to fat bottom lines, dividends and consistent returns doesn't appease eco-minded shareholders.
Or, for that matter, all profit-minded shareholders. Some argue their push for change isn't just environmentally driven, its focused on the bottom line as well. Exxon, they argue, isn't doing enough to position itself for the future, when potential carbon legislation and supply constraints will force the company to do more to diversify away from its dependence on oil and gas revenues.
The vote may have failed to produce immediate change, but it should embolden shareholders of other companies to renew similar efforts. As owners of the companies, they do in fact have a say over how they're run.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opin=
=3D =3D3D ion about the performance of securities and financial markets by =
the wr=3D iter=3D3D s whose articles appear on the site. The views expresse=
d by the wri=3D ters are=3D3D not necessarily the views of Minyanville Medi=
a, Inc. or members=3D of its man=3D3D agement. Nothing contained on the web=
site is intended to con=3D stitute a recom=3D3D mendation or advice address=
ed to an individual investor =3D or category of inve=3D3D stors to purchase=
, sell or hold any security, or to =3D take any action with re=3D3D spect t=
o the prospective movement of the securit=3D ies markets or to solicit t=3D=
3D he purchase or sale of any security. Any inv=3D estment decisions must b=
e made =3D3D by the reader either individually or in =3D consultation with =
his or her invest=3D3D ment professional. Minyanville write=3D rs and staff=
may trade or hold position=3D3D s in securities that are discuss=3D ed in =
articles appearing on the website. Wr=3D3D iters of articles are requir=3D =
ed to disclose whether they have a position in =3D3D any stock or fund disc=
us=3D sed in an article, but are not permitted to disclos=3D3D e the size o=
r direct=3D ion of the position. Nothing on this website is intende=3D3D d =
to solicit bus=3D iness of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Mi=
ny=3D3D anville mana=3D gement and staff as well as contributing writers wi=
ll not respo=3D3D nd to em=3D ails or other communications requesting inves=
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter