Iron Condors: Three Rules of Thumb
Though there really isn't a generic set of generalizations that works for everyone, these might help.
"I recently ran into trouble with some high-probability iron condors on Russel 2000. I know this has been a difficult month but would like to know which "rules of thumb" to apply to this type of trade."
I don't believe there's a generic set of rules or generalizations that works for everyone.
I know this rule of thumb is important:
Don't allow the position to move outside your comfort zone.
However, that's not a useful rule. To begin, there's no way for anyone to understand where your comfort zone lies. It's even difficult for you to know. You'll know when the position upsets you or makes you nervous -- but by that time you're already beyond your boundaries. Thus, you must have a way to "do something" before that happens. Not so easy when you cannot recognize when the zone boundaries are about to be breached.
One way to make that "stay within the zone" rule easier to achieve is to adjust trades early, rather than late. What will that do for you? It makes the position less risky, making it less likely the position will reach the point of making you uncomfortable. The problem with that idea is that many adjustments result in a loss -- possible through a poor choice of which adjustment to make -- but why spend money on insurance unless that's your preferred approach?
But, there are side effects. It makes you adjust more frequently. Is that a good thing for your situation? How can anyone know? Why should you take a more conservative view just because it's not easy to determine when it's the proper time to make that adjustment?
The point is that there's no suitable rule of thumb. By definition, that's supposed to be a general rule, or one that applies to almost everyone.
How about this as a rule of thumb?
High-probability iron condors aren't your friends.
That doesn't seem right, does it? More than that, what's "high probability"? Is it 95% or 90% or 80%? The way you define the term is probably nothing similar to the way others define it.
If you choose 98% probability iron condors (that means there's a 2% chance, if held to expiration, that one of the options will finish in the money), the low premium makes this methodology unsuitable for the majority. The delta for each short option in the iron condor is 0.01 -- and that means a low premium.
Why unsuitable for most? Because undisciplined traders cannot bring themselves to adjust, or exit, a position to lock in a loss. When you trade 98% iron condors, any adjustment is likely to lock in a loss. That makes trading them a losing strategy for most investors.
The problem is, can that rule of thumb be used? I don't think so. Especially for anyone who considers a 75% to 80% chance of success to be a high probability.
You can use this rule of thumb -- I know it will help with the problem:
Trade smaller size.
The easiest method for managing money (and thus, managing risk) is to be certain the size of the position isn't too large. Imagine a gap opening that makes one side of the iron condor completely ITM. If the amount lost would hurt, then the position is too large. Trade smaller.
If you manage money properly, the position won't be too risky. That already helps when the markets don't behave. Outside of that rule, I'd suggest that you look into becoming a bit less aggressive and consider making small adjustments earlier than you do now. Even an early one-lot can make a difference.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter