Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

No More Free Lunch for Volatility Sellers?

By

The gap that had been providing such reliable profits is no longer intact.

PrintPRINT

One month ago the VIX closed at a 2009 record low of 20.69, so it shouldn't be a big surprise that realized volatility over the course of the past month has been higher than predicted by the VIX. What I find interesting about this development is that last week was the first time since February 27 (exactly one week before the market bottomed) that 21-day realized volatility turned out to be higher than the level of volatility predicted by the VIX.

What does this mean?

In the chart of the week below, I show the relationship between the VIX and realized volatility 21 days hence since the beginning of the year. The key point to emphasize is that since the beginning of 2009 (actually going back to November 20, 2008) the VIX had anticipated higher volatility that actually occurred in the next 21 trading days in all but nine trading days in February -- until last week. On Monday, Wednesday, and Friday of last week, the 9-month string was broken, as 21-day realized volatility exceed that of the VIX from 30 days ago.


Click to enlarge


While one may argue about the ability of the VIX and realized volatility to predict market direction (in my opinion, it's a reasonably successful indicator, but a long way from perfect), there's no arguing that those who have been selling volatility and pocketing easy money since the March bottom in stocks are now finding that the "volatility gap" -- which had been providing such reliable profits -- is no longer intact.

Going forward, I think the gap between the VIX and realized volatility should be watched for market direction clues, but more importantly, it should provide clues about whether opportunities to sell volatility for an easy profit are still available -- and thus provide a window into the mind of options traders.

For additional posts on related subjects, readers are encouraged to check out:

No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

 

 

 

 

 

PrintPRINT
 
Featured Videos

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE