Financial Markets: The Good, Bad and Ugly
Taking a tour of a wild week.
So what shot does the BLS up and pull? Better than expected job growth in April (thanks, in some ways, to McDonald's (MCD) which hired 62,000 folks in one day) and upward revisions in March which have alleviated, at least for the time being, concerns that higher fuel prices served as an implicit tax on the consumer (these readings were taken prior to the commodity carnage).
While it's long been our view that these numbers are "massaged," the on-the-surface takeaway is the biggest monthly gain since May 2010, which should play well in the weekend press.
Consistent with the A.D.D. mindset on Wall Street, that was then and this is now, and profitability resides in the ride ahead. To understand where we are, we must appreciate how we got here and this week offered a healthy dose of perspective, context, and lessons.
Let’s take stock of some of the fun.
Reaction to news is always more important to the news itself. We share that in good times and bad and as it stands, despite tremendous anxiety across the asset class spectrum, the S&P is again trading above critical support at 1340.
That, along with the action in the transports, offers the best technical elements in the current construct, along with the alleviation of the heretofore persistent overbought condition.
And of course, the credit markets continue to impress and while they're not a predictive panacea, they remain the single biggest positive in global financial markets. (Watch Risk On, Risk Off: Is the Rally Over?)
Deterioration under the hood, or the action in previous leadership equities and sectors, must be noted. Stocks like Goldman Sachs (GS), Google (GOOG), Apple (AAPL), and General Electric (GE) are all tracing out patterns of "lower highs" which is traditionally a cause for pause.
I would also note the inability of the financials to push through the BKX 52 as an overt negative. While the leaders coming out of a crisis are rarely the same as those who enter them, this complex continues to encapsulate our finance-based global economy.
In a word, commodities. The key takeaways, -- regardless of how you’re positioned -- are that this magnitude of volatility, in any asset class, is rarely if ever bullish and that's been proven in silver.com, which effectively crashed this week (I wonder if anyone in Washington is taking notes on the impact of margin requirements as a "tool" in their forward arsenal?).
I will also note that commodity volatility typically precedes equity movement; while the VXO traded 40% higher, trough to peak since last week, it continues to trade in a teenage wasteland. (Watch: Silver Volatility Implies Trouble for Stocks.)
The Swing Factor
There has been a lot of chatter about how the end of QE2 might impact financial markets. I've said on numerous occasions that the primary purpose of this program was to "reflate risk" and allow financial institutions to roll their debt and issue equity (read: transfer the risk to the taxpaying public), which we saw long ago (corporate balance sheets effectively bought themselves time). I also noted that commodities could bear the brunt of that dynamic, which may have contributed to the carnage this week.
That's not the swing factor, however; in my view, the second derivative of the QE2 closure could be a rally in the US dollar, which may have put in an important bottom yesterday. Given the universal hatred of the dollar (sentiment was massively lopsided as of last week), the prevalence of the carry trade and the correlation risk in the marketplace, a greenback rally could disrupt markets on numerous levels, few of which would be positive. Watch it please, and respect the leverage behind each and every tick.
Good luck today and more importantly, have a fantastic weekend!
Follow Todd and over 30 professional traders as they share their ideas in real-time with a FREE 14 day trial to Buzz & Banter.
Todd Harrison is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Minyanville. Prior to his current role, Mr. Harrison was President and head trader at a $400 million dollar New York-based hedge fund. Todd welcomes your comments and/or feedback at firstname.lastname@example.org.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.