Regulatory Risk Abounds!
The witch-hunt widens on Wall Street.
Juxtapose those obligations against the massive counter-party risk in a finance-based global economy tied together with upwards of $500 trillion dollars in notional derivatives and it becomes clear why the European Union is attempting to create an IMF-style bailout fund, which they hope will take shape by midyear.
Let’s assume policymakers learned from the first phase of the financial crisis, that they’ll be proactive rather than reactive in their efforts to snuff out the next fuse of contagion. Those measures will likely be centered around sweeping regulatory reform of the vehicles that are used to make bets on the outcome they’re so desperately trying to avoid.
One potential “solution” is to suspend Credit Default Swaps as speculative vehicles and allow only the institutions that hold the underlying bonds to use them to hedge their holdings. If such regulation is adopted, the knee-jerk reaction could be a “melt-up” in the marketplace, much like we initially witnessed in September 2008 when short sales in the financials were banned. See Martial Law for the Markets.
Given the quest for global financial stability, such legislation wouldn’t be a shocker; it would, however, be far from a panacea for a few reasons. First, the chasm between a prolonged political process and the dynamic markets creates implementation risk. Let’s remember, capitalism almost flat-lined before a panic-induced plan was finally voted into place.
Second, there will be unforeseen unintended consequences for our intertwined financial world. In addition to the mechanical shifts -- the ever-changing process of shorting stocks, the re-pricing of put premiums and the repositioning of risk -- casualties of war will invariably be linked to other institutions.
Finally, credit default swaps were not the root cause of the financial crisis. While they make for an easy mark -- and to be fair, exacerbate the volatility of the underlying vehicles -- they’re not the problem, in and of themselves. This regulation, should it come to pass, will buy time and effect price but it won’t alter the prognosis for the global economic condition.
The cumulative imbalances have been building for many years and the true source of stress -- untenable debt, excessive leverage, wildfire derivatives and reactive policies -- won’t magically disappear with the wave of a regulatory wand. True medicine that cures the disease -- as opposed to synthetic drugs that mask the symptoms -- will only arrive when we swallow the bitter pill of debt destruction. See also Anatomy of a Recession.
To be sure, a new sheriff should step into the Wild West of CDS; there needs to be a semblance of order, a monitored process and a regulated procedure. A coordinated initiative to reign in speculative bets will achieve the desired near-term outcome but it has profound implications for the future of free markets, or the traditional definition thereof.
The options being weighed are in many cases a choice between the least of many evils. Given the destination we arrive at pales in comparison to the path we take to get there, bulls and bears alike would be wise to respect the potential effect of this sweeping regulatory reform.
Todd Harrison is the founder and Chief Executive Officer of Minyanville. Prior to his current role, Mr. Harrison was President and head trader at a $400 million dollar New York-based hedge fund. Todd welcomes your comments and/or feedback at email@example.com.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.