Bank of America
The latest trouble for the banking giant is a decision by MBIA (MBI)
MBIA has accused Bank of America's Countrywide home loan unit of fraud and breach of contract related to 15 mortgage securities. On Jan. 3, New York State Supreme Court Justice Eileen Bransten ruled MBIA does not need to prove claims payments it has made on the securities were a direct result of the alleged misrepresentations.
Judge Bransten also ruled the insurer can seek damages against Bank of America if it can prove there were misrepresentations by the bank and that MBIA would not have written the insurance if the misrepresentations had not been made.
Bank of America appealed the ruling on Jan. 25, arguing MBIA and Syncora (SYCRF.PK)
On Monday, however, MBIA filed its cross appeal because it had hoped Bransten would rule that
MBIA's cross appeal is similar to one filed by Syncora on Jan. 5.
According to Palmer, the appeals by the bond insurers "put the worst-case scenario back on the table for
Rather than see that happen, Palmer expects Bank of America to settle the case. Palmer and other analysts have estimated a settlement would cost Bank of America about $2 billion. Citigroup analyst Keith Horowitz has estimated Bank of America's ultimate legal tab related to problem mortgages from the housing boom will be $47, though perhaps as much as $67 billion in a worst case.
Paul Miller of FBR Capital Markets has come up with similar estimates, though he sees an outside chance losses could turn out to be many multiples of that.
Spokesmen for Bank of America and MBIA declined to comment.