The End of Federal Benefit Insulation
By
Peter Atwater
Jun 06, 2011 9:40 am
To these eyes, Europe is a preview of the painful process we as a nation face ahead.
This morning’s Wall Street Journal includes an editorial on federal retirement benefits, offering that “it’s only fair that federal pensions are finally drawing some scrutiny”, and concluding, “No one is trying to impose a hardship on government employees, but they also shouldn’t be insulated from the economic and fiscal trends that affect all workers.”
While I will leave the specific debate on federal pensions to others, I thought the editorial staff’s concluding comment captured so much about the difficult choices we face.
To believe the Journal, “burden sharing”, whether it’s reducing benefits on public employees here or imposing losses on sovereign or financial institution bondholders in Europe, is not about the purposeful creation of hardship, it is about ending “insulation”.
Unfortunately, one man’s “insulation” is another man’s expectation of normal -- as it has always been, thus it should always continue to be. And anything less than that is loss. And where I come from, loss is hardship, despite valiant editorial attempts to suggest otherwise.
As I have said so many times, it's all about the re-syndication of loss. And one need only Google “Greek bailout” to witness the real time resyndication efforts of governments, supra-governments, sovereign and financial institution creditors and voters (across Europe).
To these eyes, Europe is a preview of the painful process we as a nation face ahead as insulation is ended. And I strongly doubt that federal government employees will be the only ones affected in this process. As I look ahead, those most insulated to date from “the economic and fiscal trends that affect all workers” appear most vulnerable to deteriorating social mood.
Last fall, when I wrote Our Zero Sum Economy many believed that governments would continue to “insulate” wherever they had to, in order to protect their economic recoveries.
Clearly that's no longer the case.
Insulation is ending. And investors would be wise to consider the implications to their portfolios.
While I will leave the specific debate on federal pensions to others, I thought the editorial staff’s concluding comment captured so much about the difficult choices we face.
To believe the Journal, “burden sharing”, whether it’s reducing benefits on public employees here or imposing losses on sovereign or financial institution bondholders in Europe, is not about the purposeful creation of hardship, it is about ending “insulation”.
Unfortunately, one man’s “insulation” is another man’s expectation of normal -- as it has always been, thus it should always continue to be. And anything less than that is loss. And where I come from, loss is hardship, despite valiant editorial attempts to suggest otherwise.
As I have said so many times, it's all about the re-syndication of loss. And one need only Google “Greek bailout” to witness the real time resyndication efforts of governments, supra-governments, sovereign and financial institution creditors and voters (across Europe).
To these eyes, Europe is a preview of the painful process we as a nation face ahead as insulation is ended. And I strongly doubt that federal government employees will be the only ones affected in this process. As I look ahead, those most insulated to date from “the economic and fiscal trends that affect all workers” appear most vulnerable to deteriorating social mood.
Last fall, when I wrote Our Zero Sum Economy many believed that governments would continue to “insulate” wherever they had to, in order to protect their economic recoveries.
Clearly that's no longer the case.
Insulation is ending. And investors would be wise to consider the implications to their portfolios.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

business news
PRINT



















