Why 1345-1370 on the S&P 500 Is Likely to Fail as Resistance
A simple rule of technical analysis states that the more a level gets tested, the weaker it gets -- and hence it ultimately gets broken.
In 2011 the 1345-1370 area had formed a nice head-and-shoulders pattern that in early August hit its ultimate target around 1150.
After chopping around for two months the index finally found a tradable bottom on October 4 at 1075. Stocks then proceeded to rally a quick 20% and paused at the 1280 area in late October. From there the S&P 500 built an inverse head-and-shoulders pattern that ultimately broke out in late December and led to the 8% rally the index has seen thus far. The textbook target for this inverse head-and-shoulders pattern is 1360, which we reached last Friday, January 17.
And so here we are right in the middle of the 1345-1370 range and right at the target level of this latest inverse head-and-shoulders level.
Another important reason why the 1360 level plus/minus 10 points has acted as good resistance is because it is the exact 76.4% Fibonacci retracement level of the move from the late 2007 highs to the early 2009 highs.
A simple rule of technical analysis states that the more a level gets tested the weaker it gets and hence that it ultimately gets broken. I believe such will ultimately be the case and the S&P 500 will move toward and possibly above the 1400 area at some point in 2012.
However, given the steep ascent stocks have made over the past two months (all without any meaningful pullbacks in price) a price correction first is needed. A correction of anywhere from 3% to 6% would take the S&P 500 somewhere between 1280 and 1330. From there the index will have a better chance at hurdling itself above the 1360 area and stay there, at least for a while.
So there you have it: 1360 is likely to ultimately fail as resistance, and a pullback of a few percentage points beforehand would make that break all the stronger.
Editor's Note: Read more at The Steady Trader.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or o=
pinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the wri=
ters whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers =
are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its =
management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a re=
commendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of i=
nvestors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with=
respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solici=
t the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be ma=
de by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her inv=
estment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold posit=
ions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website.=
Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position =
in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disc=
lose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is inte=
nded to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. M=
inyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not re=
spond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.