Market Thoughts, Macro Themes, and Tech Sector Outlook Heading Into 2011
Here, Sean Udall discusses his predicitions and expands on them in the new TechStrat Report. Read on to find out how to get a 14-day free trial.
While my investment and trading strategies have evolved over the years, my focus has always centered around building strong fundamental investment themes and good old-fashioned stock-picking. Through the years, I've added trading techniques, options and technical analysis and one thing seems crystal clear: All those things just work better if the underlying fundamentals are supportive.
The other aspect is, I just love the hunt for the next idea. By this I mean, I have a passion for the long hours spent digging through EPS reports, screens, news flow, chart studies, and now a seemingly endless array of research reports. So I hope you enjoy the product and that it allows you to spend less time on the above toil and more time pursuing your own passions.
I hope that TechStrat will provide a one-stop shop for all things related to tech stocks, with my thoughts, your thoughts and questions via the Mailbag, and then important research and news from various places organized in the Research Tank.
As we get started with the TechStrat program, I felt it would be good to give readers an idea of my thoughts on the market and technology sector in general as well as an outlook for 2011 and beyond. Below are both my macro themes as well as tech-specific themes. Obviously, I'll be expanding upon both through TechStrat posts as we move forward.
1. Bifurcation in the market: Broadly, I think this year will be dictated by a movement to bifurcation. From a world where stocks that have risen the most keep rising, to a world where some names finally pull a Duran and say "no mas." I see a potential for some violent down moves in certain names (and possibly some commodities as well). This list of potential ultra-violence victims is growing by the day. On the other side are slews of laggard stocks which have produced similar improvement (in revenue and EPS metrics) to the biggest stock winners. So we may finally see dynamic catch-up moves in stocks that have experienced massive valuation compression. Even though I see many stocks rising from a "catch-up" effect, I will maintain my view that "growth" outperforms "value." As previously stated, this cycle started in 2009 and my view is that it runs four to six years in total.
2. Contrarian take on government stimulus: Just as I outlined in my themes piece last year, "Much of the media and negative pundits will continue to say that various financial government stimulus packages are the main reason that stocks and certain economic indicators/measures are rising, and until this prevailing sentiment shifts, the stock market bulls will likely be rewarded." Again as a thematic investor and trader, many of my working themes stay in place for years, and this is one of them. In time people will realize that the power of the undying capitalism in the world now is very hard to hold back. As I've written in numerous Buzz & Banter posts for a couple years now, I think many of the stimulus programs have served to delay or constrain growth, not stimulate it. I think in the fullness of time this view will be proven more correct. 2010 provided many examples of this. Car sales exploded after Cash for Clunkers was fully put in the rear-view mirror. The pent-up demand of the very old car fleet took care of itself once the market mechanisms were allowed to work. Bandwidth spending finally surged after years of being constrained by various measures (some constraints still continue). Note the moves in Akamai (AKAM), Riverbed Technology (RVBD), and F5 Networks (FFIV).
3. Sticking with variant economic view (but see that ending): I still see my highly variant economic view (of growth and the anti-going-into-the-abyss camp) continuing to work, though I now fully expect that 2011 will be a year where at least some of the economic camp changes and becomes too ebullient. Net, net GDP growth and jobs improvement should still be above consensus for at least two quarters and possibly the full year.
Interestingly, while many talk little of government stimulus programs now, there is still a sizable pile of money left to be deployed, and just like last year, more "actual" stimulus money will be infused into the economy than in 2009. The market has been very thin on the leadership front with just a few bright stars shouldering an Atlas-like load since the bull market started. My view is this changes and broadens out. If not, then I do think that might be an important tell to a very serious correction.
Tech Themes for 2011:
Earlier today, I posted some of my macro themes for the coming year, and below are a number of my tech-specific themes as we head toward 2011.
1. Starting the themes just like last year: I see extremely low rates through 2011 -- with my range being 25 bps to 75 bps of tightening and my gut feel that we see the Federal Reserve remove its 0 bps to 25 bps funds rate and replace it with either a 25 bps or 50 bps (or a 25 bps to 50 bps floating) funds rate.
The important part to this is that I've long held the unique view that the longer the Fed base rates stay very low, the stronger the ultimate growth trajectory is. This should continue to spur stronger-than-expected economic activity (not the converse, which is so often argued). Net, net, this is a core reason I've stuck with my highly variant view (since early 2009) of a stronger recovery and GDP growth than commonly expected while inflation remains benign.
2. The network keeps exploding: Web-based video is secular, bandwidth growth is secular, touchscreen proliferation is secular, mobility, data retention, business intelligence applications etc... I could go on and on with this. In my view, many technologies today are finally seeing the realization of the early days' promises of many of the advancements which we first saw over a decade ago now. This theme has essentially been in place since the end of 2008 and I just don't see a major reason to change it yet. In fact, it's now evolving given the sheer amount of traffic flowing freely with ever-increasing speeds over myriad wireless networks. Private equity is seeing this effect -- see the CommScope (CTV) deal and others. The biggest industry players are seeing this as we have seen a large increase in M&A in this group. And now the big cable and telco's are trying to find more ways to monetize their network ownership.
Cisco (CSCO) has been one of the few disappointing names. Nearly all of my other featured names have exploded -- see Broadcom (BRCM), EZchip Semiconductor (EZCH), Atheros Communications (ATHR), VMware (VMW), and others. The rub now is that fewer names are reasonably priced, and very few are the outright steal they were just six to nine months ago. However, this is a fairly large subset of players in this group and the landscape is very fluid. Given the backdrop I'll stay very focused here as I think there are still plenty of opportunities in this space to take advantage of. Interestingly, I don't see a lot of bifurcation here, save a couple key examples emerging.
3. Potential rub in the growth thesis: Gas prices rise at least 10% and have an outside chance of rising two to three times that level. If this were to occur ($3.80-4 gas or higher) some of my variant growth thesis would be at risk.
4. Alternate energy and auto transportation: This is an ever-expanding theme and I may have to break it into a couple pieces next year. So this year I'm expanding the alternate-energy thesis to include major enhancements in auto transportation. To me, the key drivers are similar. We are going to increase the proliferation in electric-car development. General Electric (GE) just announced the first major fleet deal in this space. Moreover, this feeds my research into the battery-technology space. Following this theme we still are in dire need of improved grid technology and more efficient uses of energy with increased energy production.
On the auto front I'm also seeing major enhancements or inventions regarding crash avoidance, driver assisted and connected mobility applications. I think electric/hybrid cars are here to stay, and this will be a major growth driver for various technology sub-sectors in the years to come.
5. Industrial growth fuels the old line semiconductors: This could be part of my auto-transportation thesis. However, this involves the increased spending by the whole industrial complex which requires a massive amount of new diodes, transistors, and sensors for many new production and product innovations. GE, 3M (MMM), Caterpillar (CAT), and others are all infusing more labor and safety enhancements. The sensor market in particular is something that I'm ramping my research into along with old line/traditional names such as Vishay Intertechnology (VSH), AVX Corp (AVX), Fairchild Semi (FCS), and Texas Instruments (TXN).
6. IPO's are front page news again. M&A stays strong: As I said for two years, the IPO market isn't dead, and I expect 2011 to be as strong or grow from 2010 levels. I thought Facebook would launch in 2010 and still feel it will be the deal of the year if it hits GO in 2011. One speculation I have is that it may start sacrificing value if it waits beyond 2011. We have just seen two very strong deals (YOKU and DANG) from China and I expect to see acceleration in strong foreign deals.
On the Buzz & Banter and in the article Consider a Barbell Strategy in Tech, I highlighted names such Blue Coat Systems (BCSI), CommScope, ADC Telecom, Verigy (VRGY), Electronic Arts (ERTS), Dell (DELL), MKS Instruments (MKSI), and ADTRAN (ADTN). Some of these have already been acquired or have announced deals. This should continue and possibly accelerate. I will continue to monitor many of the names I've previously highlighted as key potential targets. Again my research focuses on niche leaders across various tech sub-sectors exhibiting a unique blend of performance, growth, end-market potential, and balance-sheets characteristics.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.