Why Hanging On to UNG Is Risky Business
Until ETF begins issuing new shares, it's functionally a closed-end fund.
Why the premium? Regulators are concerned that, given its size, UNG purchases of natural-gas futures could overwhelm and distort the market. Some sort of Commodities Trading Futures Commission (CTFC) action is expected, and one review suggests that any likely outcome will result in a dissipation of the fund's premium to NAV. That's a good reason not to buy UNG here, and it may offer a good opportunity for a statistical-arbitrage play for those with the stomach and expertise: The trade would be to buy natural gas futures and sell short the ETF -- or, since the shares are hard to borrow, competent options traders will establish a synthetic short position by selling calls and buying puts with the same strike price and expiration date -- on the expectation of UNG eventually returning to its net-asset value.
But since hand-wringing over UNG seems to be the consensus approach, here's a contrarian thought: UNG has, to date, tracked natural gas futures (NG) fairly well. The chart below compares UNG and NG prices in 2009:
We can agree that the spread between UNG and NG over the summer was a cause for concern among UNG shareholders (and what would have happened if the futures hadn't turned south again in August?). But overall, things appear to be in order. In 2009, the natural-gas ETF has tracked natural-gas futures almost as closely as SPY prices have correlated with Emini S&P 500 futures. None of this diminishes the case against UNG -- after all, the fear is of either a regulatory event or a market dislocation at some future date. And until those worries are resolved, shareholders are taking on risks for which they aren't being compensated.
But so far, they haven't been punished for taking the bet.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter