Waiting on the Real Stock Market Low
A funny thing happened on the way to a lower low -- we found one, and then another, and then one more.
A funny thing happened on the way to a lower low -- we found one, and then another, and then one more. The last series of lows from yesterday and today at least exhibited the price and emotional signatures that were absent from the early June low. You might recall in mid-June I wrote that market bottoms are much easier to appraise then a market top.
Recognizing a market low is a much clearer discipline than determining tops. From the geometry of price to the emotional response echoed within the market, they are typically "you know it when you see it" events. Bear markets take that dynamic and slowly erode it away over the course of each successive low. It remains to be seen whether we are on that proportional course, but we should be approaching a low sooner rather than later."
The S&P then discretely turned on a dime before putting in a lower low and ripped more than 90 points higher in a straight line. This was one of the primary reasons I held a short position that was trapped on the way up. It had all the signatures of a violent countertrend shakeout, then a rejuvenation of the primary trend. From my perspective it was actually less risky to maintain my position, then make a series of trades -- each a step behind the market because I was chasing performance, rather than following my plan. Granted the data miners seemed relatively confidence that the rarity of strength and velocity personified in the move was a feather in the bulls' quiver, rather than a sign of a market searching for its own moxie (see here and here).
So was today the low?
Below is a chart that gives a bit more perspective to the large moves in treasury yields today. I look at the current yield environment as the Great Reflation, and compare it to the initial experiment by our previous monetary handlers -- the Baby Reflation. The dynamic and kinetic relationships with the markets are just the same, but the proportions of the moves are vastly greater today than they were in 2004. So with that said, take the large downdraft in treasury yields today with a grain of salt, because they are working off of a trend bottom that was so extreme. I don't think it was a coincidence that the equity markets capitulated in early August 2004 just as yields broke their level of support from the 2003 bottom. The exact same occurrence (yields breaking support while stocks make new lows) is transpiring today as I write this. The equity market in 2004 was digesting the uncertainty as the Fed began removing the historic monetary accommodations. The fear materialized with a skittish stock market and very strong demand for US treasuries. Sound familiar?
Click to enlarge
As a parting thought, at no point since the March 2009 low has there been more legitimacy in the bear camp as we head into the dreaded fall trading season. But just remember that autumn's bark is typically worse than its bite, and if Europe finds a way through the month of August, fear becomes the variant behavioral tilt in the bulls' favor as the herd chases performance into year end.
Editor's Note: This article was originally posted on Market Anthropology.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.