Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Six Fortune 500 Companies Move Regional Headquarters to Shanghai

By

In all, 24 multinationals have moved to this top destination in China, pushing the total number of companies with regional headquarters there to almost 300.

PrintPRINT

When you have a tax policy that begs corporations to move workers and profits overseas, this is what you should expect: 24 Multinationals Move HQ to Shanghai:

Twenty-four multinational companies have decided to move their regional headquarters to Shanghai, including six Fortune 500 companies such as Vale (VALE), Walt Disney (DIS), and Kraft Foods (KFT).

This will push the total number of companies with regional headquarters in Shanghai to nearly 300. Nearly 500 have regional research and development centers there.

Shanghai has been China's top destination, for multinationals. Even during the world economic slump, the city's foreign direct investment still increased. Data shows Shanghai's foreign direct investment has already surpassed more than 5 billion US dollars in the first half of this year.


US tax policy allows deferral of taxes on corporate profits held overseas. Tax policy, in conjunction with global wage arbitrage, practically begs corporations to move jobs and profits overseas.

Meanwhile, small businesses struggling in the US face higher taxes and increased medical expenses thanks to the Obama administration. It's a lose-lose situation for small businesses versus larger multinationals.

The worst part of this sorry situation is small businesses are the real economic driver for jobs.

For further discussion of small businesses, job creation, and our inept policies, please see Bleak Outlook for Small Businesses and Job Creation; Where Obama Went Wrong, and What to do About It.

Addendum

Some people pointed out the use of the word "regional." Offices didn't move out of the US.

True enough.

However, the likelihood those regional offices are bigger at the expense of US is high, but admittedly there's no way of knowing. However the underlying message on tax policy is valid regardless.

No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
PrintPRINT

Busy? Subscribe to our free newsletter!

Submit
 

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE