What "QALY," "ICER" Mean to Health Care Companies and Investors
Both terms are part of pharmacoeconomics -- the study of the economics of health care, drugs -- and are important to understand.
Pharmacoeconomics is the study of the economics of health care, specifically the economics of drugs. This rapidly growing new field attempts to turn the benefits of a drug, the side effects of the drug, and the cost of a drug into one neat number. Pharmacoeconomics is used by drug developers to make cost/benefit decisions that affect R&D spending as well as to determine price for a newly approved drug. Insurers and even doctors will make decisions about what drugs to use or order of use in competing drugs based upon pharmacoeconomics.
Cost-based treatment decisions have been happening in the US for as long as the field has existed. This predates recently passed health-care reform. Pharmacoeconomics was given no new role in the recent health-care reforms, so it’s okay to relax the partisan political hackles. This article is exposition, not oratory.
The Quality Adjusted Life Year (QALY, pronounced “qually” rhyming with “Wally”) is a math-based attempt to quantify a drug’s benefit over a patient’s lifetime. This approach is used across pharma to set prices and do competitive analyses. Where it is most famous is in the UK where decisions about what drugs are covered by their health-care system are made with the help of QALY metrics.
Here is a good definition of QALY from a UK source (emphasis theirs):
A quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) takes into account both the quantity and quality of life generated by health care interventions. It is the arithmetic product of life expectancy and a measure of the quality of the remaining life-years.
Every once in a while, I see people who ought to know better making an obviously incorrect QALY calculation. The most egregious of these errors is annualizing a drug’s median benefit, multiplying it by its cost, and calling the result “QALY.” I have no idea what such a calculation is called, but it isn’t a QALY. Let me illustrate with an example:
Let’s say a drug costs $50,000 for a course of treatment. That drug has a median survival benefit of four months. The mistake some people make is simply annualizing the median benefit and multiplying it by the cost. In this example, that erroneous approach would produce a figure of $150,000. This is not a QALY, it’s some other animal.
(If you want to try to compare costs only using median survival, this can be done. A good example of this approach is in an article I wrote previously on the cost of Dendreon’s (DNDN) Provenge, entitled Dendreon's Provenge Costs the Same as Chemotherapy.
QALY is a sophisticated measure. It looks at the benefit for a drug across all patients’ lifetimes, not just the incremental benefit received by a single median patient. It accounts for the guy who lived three years on treatment and the woman who lived three months. In fact, QALY has little or nothing to do with median survival or any other median benefit.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

business news
PRINT



















