Cart (0)
VIDEOLower Chinese PMI: Canary in the Coal Mine?
By
Prieur du Plessis
Mar 02, 2010 9:20 am
The latest suite of manufacturing indices warrants more than cursory attention.
Editor's Note: This article was originally published on Prieur's blog, Investment Postcards from Cape Town.
China’s PMI numbers for February were released yesterday and received surprisingly little media attention. Although I'm usually not keen to slice and dice single-month statistics too intensely, the latest suite of manufacturing indices does seem to warrant more than cursory attention.
Firstly, a summary of the numbers as provided by the China Federation of Logistics & Purchasing (CFLP) and reported by the Li & Fung Group.
PMI Report on China Manufacturing: February 2010
The rate of expansion of China’s manufacturing sector that accounts for more than 50% of the economy has moderated sharply, with the overall PMI falling to 52. Just on its own (excluding the non-manufacturing sector) it seems as if China’s year-on-year economic growth in the second quarter could slow to 10% and even less.
The following graph provides the same information, but over the longer term.
The manufacturing industry has started to shed excess inventories as stocks of major inputs indicate contraction. This doesn't bode well for metal prices in at least the short term.
New orders are still expanding but at a significantly reduced pace. However, new export orders fell sharply from 53.2 to 50.3, indicating only marginal expansion. New orders and new export orders lead the Economist Metals Index by approximately one month. The drop in especially new export orders doesn't augur well for metal prices and downside pressure can be expected.
The roll-over in new export orders is particularly evident and the question is whether this could indicate a trend change.
The drop in both new orders and stocks of major inputs perhaps explains the weakness in the Baltic Dry Index. Imports of raw materials such as ores and metals have probably dropped significantly.
A major question is how the slowdown in China is going to affect the rest of the global economy. The contraction in China’s PMI for imports indicates that the US GDP-weighted PMI for exports could be negatively influenced in especially the second quarter of this year.
Likewise the US GDP-weighted PMI for imports could be under pressure …
The further austerity measures put in place recently by the Chinese authorities still need to rub off on China’s economy. As such the outlook for commodities, the US and global economy has possibly darkened somewhat.
Elsewhere, the PMIs of India and South Korea were also published, with both economies expanding at the fastest pace in nearly two years. There are already calls for India to suspend the stimulatory measures in order to cool the economy.
One swallow doesn't make a summer, but I'll be monitoring the Chinese situation closely to try to gauge the possible impact of any cooling on the developed economies.
Note: The graphs in this post were provided by Plexus Asset Management (based on data from CFLP, ISM, I-Net Bridge and Dismal Scientist.
China’s PMI numbers for February were released yesterday and received surprisingly little media attention. Although I'm usually not keen to slice and dice single-month statistics too intensely, the latest suite of manufacturing indices does seem to warrant more than cursory attention.
Firstly, a summary of the numbers as provided by the China Federation of Logistics & Purchasing (CFLP) and reported by the Li & Fung Group.
PMI Report on China Manufacturing: February 2010
The rate of expansion of China’s manufacturing sector that accounts for more than 50% of the economy has moderated sharply, with the overall PMI falling to 52. Just on its own (excluding the non-manufacturing sector) it seems as if China’s year-on-year economic growth in the second quarter could slow to 10% and even less.
The following graph provides the same information, but over the longer term.
The manufacturing industry has started to shed excess inventories as stocks of major inputs indicate contraction. This doesn't bode well for metal prices in at least the short term.
New orders are still expanding but at a significantly reduced pace. However, new export orders fell sharply from 53.2 to 50.3, indicating only marginal expansion. New orders and new export orders lead the Economist Metals Index by approximately one month. The drop in especially new export orders doesn't augur well for metal prices and downside pressure can be expected.
The roll-over in new export orders is particularly evident and the question is whether this could indicate a trend change.
The drop in both new orders and stocks of major inputs perhaps explains the weakness in the Baltic Dry Index. Imports of raw materials such as ores and metals have probably dropped significantly.
A major question is how the slowdown in China is going to affect the rest of the global economy. The contraction in China’s PMI for imports indicates that the US GDP-weighted PMI for exports could be negatively influenced in especially the second quarter of this year.
Likewise the US GDP-weighted PMI for imports could be under pressure …
The further austerity measures put in place recently by the Chinese authorities still need to rub off on China’s economy. As such the outlook for commodities, the US and global economy has possibly darkened somewhat.
Elsewhere, the PMIs of India and South Korea were also published, with both economies expanding at the fastest pace in nearly two years. There are already calls for India to suspend the stimulatory measures in order to cool the economy.
One swallow doesn't make a summer, but I'll be monitoring the Chinese situation closely to try to gauge the possible impact of any cooling on the developed economies.
Note: The graphs in this post were provided by Plexus Asset Management (based on data from CFLP, ISM, I-Net Bridge and Dismal Scientist.
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
