Our Two-Hump Ski Jump Economy

By Peter Atwater Jul 12, 2011 10:00 am

What the US economy needs is jobs, and until prices support incremental private sector investment in the US, we're all on a very slippery slope headed downhill.



Last year at this time I offered that “Gravity sucks. And right now the downward pressure of high long-term unemployment, the lack of corporate investment, along with the expiration of the homebuyer tax credits is rapidly pulling the economy back toward Earth.” At the time I thought our Ski-Jump Economy was quickly coming to an end, and I even offered “With little political interest in a second round of stimulus, bank bailouts, or further quantitative easing, I'm not sure what, if anything, will keep us in the air, let alone cushion the landing.”

And then came Jackson Hole, and the announcement of QE2 and what I thought was going to be a continued downhill slide, which became a high-octane rally in financial and commodity assets.

But what the rally of the past 11 months did not bring was jobs. Worse, it brought high food and energy prices to an already frail middle- and lower-class American consumer. But what I suspect economic historians will really focus on in time is the social divide that our two-hump, asymmetric recovery created.

As the chart below from Stephanie Pomboy of Macromavens shows, not only did the average American not experience the second hump of the ski jump recovery, they didn’t experience the first, either.



For the average American it has been downhill for the last 11 years.

The problem that I see today for both fiscal and monetary policymakers is that the second hump of the ski jump recovery is now ending. We’ve whipped the Pushmi-Pullyu strategies (see Effects of the Economy's Bad Timing) employed against prior recessions about as hard as we can, and as a result I am afraid that policymakers have morphed into, well, Dr. I-Can-Do-Very-Little-At-This-Point. Further monetary easing is likely to only cause high energy and food prices to rise further, and fiscal austerity -- not generosity -- is what Washington is now focused on due to our own sovereign debt challenges.

And then there is housing. As I offered earlier this spring in A Post-Crash Realty Reality: Home as Shelter, there is little quantitative easing can or will do to stop the socionomic migration of housing as an investment and a cornerstone of upward mobility in America to homes as simply shelter. Like the aftermath of all bubbles, once a “Big Truth” becomes a “Big Lie," demand evaporates.

With the economy now once again at the end of the ski jump and policy makers handcuffed in terms of fiscal and monetary options, I suspect that they will turn their attention away from efforts to jump-start the economy to efforts to slow the economy’s descent from here. And in that regard I would not underestimate the amount and creativity of “financial repression” to be used, as policymakers repeatedly try to put a parachute on the backs of financial assets and housing and cinderblocks on the feet of commodities.

What the US economy needs is jobs, and until prices support incremental private sector investment in the United States, I am afraid that we are all on a very slippery slope headed downhill.


Stay on top of the best financial news and commentary on Wall Street by following us @Minyanville.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
Position in SPY options, SH and JPM
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
  • All the News and Insights You Need Right in Your Inbox | Sign Up for Our Free Newsletter

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE

Recommendations

MARKETS