Rising Oil Prices May Be the Forerunner to War

By Ron Coby Oct 16, 2009 9:45 am
Traders’ fears that an impending attack on Iran by either the US or Israel is related to the rise in oil prices.
  • Share this article:
  • A- A A+

The headlines are widely publicizing the new highs being made in gold. Soon the news may be directed to gushing gold in the energy space … Black Gold.

Many of the fundamental reports I read on oil say that there’s an “oil glut”, and that the world is “swimming in oil”. That may in fact be true, but our motto at Coby Lamson is that “Price is Truth” and all else is just interesting commentary.

The rising price of oil and its potential impending breakout is telling a much different story. In this piece I’ll examine price trends (the truth), and I’ll also speculate as to what the rising price of oil may be telling us.

On July 18, 2008, our Grail Indicator gave us a sell signal at $130 per barrel. See this weekly chart:


Click to enlarge


On March 17, 2009, our Grail Timing Indicator then gave us the first buy on oil at 51 per barrel after its momentous decline. Just a few days ago, we just received a confirming momentum buy on the daily chart.

With a close above $77, we see oil possibly going to $92 or $107 per barrel. A rise to $92.26 would be a 38.2% Fibonacci retracement of the full down move, and $107.26 would be a 50% retracement of the collapse from the July 11, 2008, peak to the February 13, 2009, low.

Later in this article I’ll lay out a possible scenario that could push oil to new all-time highs. Should such a rise take place, it would rock both world markets and economies.

In my recently published book Discover the Upside of Down, there’s a chapter entitled “Black Gold: Boom and Bust profit opportunities”. I believe that we may be entering a time where we’ll witness the “boom” portion of that sequence. Chapter four of Discover the Upside of Down begins with this observation:
 

The proverbial “powder keg” in the Middle East has been hanging over world markets for a very long time. As the new century rolls along, the sparks are close to setting off a combustible explosion. The fuse is getting shorter on this powder keg explosion with fears of Iran becoming nuclear and a weapon possibly finding its way into the hands of terrorists. The fuse gets shorter by the day with the political instability of Pakistan, and even shorter as the US continues the war in Iraq. With so much instability in this region, it’s only logical to assume that the fuse is close to being lit and the explosion is set to incinerate global stock markets and economies.


As the Federal Reserve frantically prints new dollars in the new century to stave off a NASDAQ 2000-like real-estate implosion, the value of those dollars lessens and that affects the exchange rate against the other world major currencies.

As the US dollar has fallen in the first several years of the new millennium, some nasty repercussions have resulted. Since oil is priced in US dollars around the world, OPEC has responded to the falling dollar with higher oil prices.

OPEC kept supplies tight to keep prices high. One reason it does this is to compensate for the reduced purchasing power of the falling dollar.

While oil-producing countries could decide to not accept US dollars, that would not only be the wrong economic decision, but would also be a very dangerous one.

When Iraq threatened to not accept US dollars as payment, it wasn’t long after that the US military invaded, and the leader who made that comment was roped and hung. Iran has recently followed Iraq’s lead and has stated that they “prefer the Euro or Yen” and no longer want to trade oil for “worthless dollars”.

< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.


(22)
2009-10-16 14:24:01
Attacking Iran
I don't believe that either the US or Israel will attack Iran's nuclear sites. Their program has gone on for too long for an attack to be successful. Israel lacks the bunker busting bombs required and the aircraft to deliver them. The Obama administration lacks the guts to do it and would be afraid that their Chinese and Russian friends would be upset. The story about the newly discovered underground nuclear facility is a joke. It has been known to exist for years. Same with the supposed rush to build bunker busting bombs. They were tested and put on rush procurement back in 2007 if I remember correctly. At this point I think that the best course of action would be for us to simply state that if Iran launches a nuclear weapon against Israel or the US,or if a nuclear weapon is used against us by terrorists, that we will consider Iran and N. Korea to be responsible and that our response will be to incinerate their nations.
2009-10-16 20:57:28
Thinking Iran will let the war happen is stupid given the fact that 60% of the government budget is oil income. OPEC already witnessed the test of $147 oil; the result was that the price collapsed.
2009-10-17 12:59:35
Attacking Iran
I hear you and agree with much of what you say. I pray the US or Israel don't bomd Iran as it could send the globe into the economic dark ages.
2009-10-17 13:02:17
Stupid is a strong word to use here. When you listen to the leadership of Iran, do you think that oil is the only thing on their minds. How about the return of the 12th IMAM....
2009-10-17 14:35:15
Leadership in Iran is more concerned about its legitimacy at home. Meeting with the West surely lands that legitimacy. Nuclear ambition is less important than its own legitimacy (it means current government stays in power, all is lost if it couldn't) and its social program (it means lifting living standards for common Iranians to quieter discontent). I don't know whether those rhetoric remarks mean anything to you, but to me (the one who worked in U.N. and actually speaks Iranian very well) it means NOTHING but talk.

Any of the oil $150 prediction is stupid. OPEC (including Iran) witnessed demand collapsing at $146 oil, no one wants to try that again. They know that if oil reaches certain level every alternative becomes attractive and when that happens people are not going back for oil. After wind turbine or solar panel are installed, what is the chance of switching back to fossil fuel? OPEC and Russia knows more than we do.
2009-10-17 15:30:38
MOAB BOMBS will be dropped by Israel no earlier than January and no later than June of 2010. Israel is capable of shutting down the sites but not capable of securing them. For that they will need US help. Watch for US fleet movement in the Straits of Hormuz to protect shipping. And stop praying, it is a useless waste of time and it confuses the gods.
2009-10-18 20:29:47
Rising Oil Prices may be a forerunner to war
Woaaaah .... Nelly!!!! Not so Fast, yes you may be an excellent armchair warrior and your news Newletter maybe GREAT and YOU would like to see the Shock and AWE of an Iranian Redux, HOWEVER I must state that the Very Best way to fix IRAN is to Fix it from within. Empower It's people with the Tools necessary to Plow their existing Government Struture into the groung so the PEOPLE can get on with their lives and live FREE from the dictator tyranny they currently suffer. They will discover Freedom has much more going for it than dictatorship. and YES their votes will count!!! we have already witnessed their People's Discust with their current Govt.

I say Empower their people with the Means Necessary and Watch what proceeds Before we Lube up the American War machine for yet another theatre.
2009-10-19 10:14:11
Andrew Diamond
Wind turbine and solar panel? Don't hold your breath on those buddy! LOL
2009-10-19 23:32:36
Rising Oil Prices may be a forerunner to war
"Empower It's people with the Tools necessary"

What tools?

"I say Empower their people with the Means Necessary "

Empower them how?

Your response sounds well and good, but is tellingly short on details. I can see only three useful responses from the US:

1) Destroy and/or aid the Israelis in destroying the nuclear sites.

2) Assassinate the Iranian hard line leadership, and attempt to install a friendlier government.

or 3) Disengage and let Iran's neighbors worry about it. This would probably shortly be followed by the Israeli's doing option 1 and regional war.

I wish the Iranian people would rise up and they appear to have tried. Now we have to answer the question "Can we live with a nuclear Iran." If the answer is no, there does not appear to be a diplomatic resolution. I don't believe in punishing the population as a whole so I think an attempt at decapitating the leadership should be considered. Also, I do not believe that Israel can ever allow a nuclear Iran as they have clearly stated an intention to destroy Israel with a nuclear device. A violent confrontation seems inevitable. If so, it is better to do it now while the confrontation would involve conventional weapons.
2009-10-19 23:37:22
Attacking Iran
For that matter so could not bombing them and allowing them to build nuclear weapons. There is no way to know the future.
2009-10-20 17:26:48
Rising Oil Prices may be a forerunner to war
I totally agree. Some of the nicest folks I've ever met are from Iran. I think the people are fed up and ready to act and we should empower them like you say.
2009-10-20 17:29:49
Steve, anything can happen and Israel is very quiet right now. If they believe their very existence could be threatened and the time to act is now then they will act and we will be drawn in as well. If oil runs to 80 then I'm going to really pay attention to this possibility.
2009-10-22 13:04:31
War
The thought of war as a way out of the recession is a possibility. When the economy hasn't been able to pull itself out of a recession on its own, a war has usually done it. Hopefully, this is not what the Admisinistration is thinking.
2009-10-25 10:33:05
strengthen the dollar with FUD

some global turmoil of some sort -- maybe a new "missile crisis" a la cuba 1963 would do the trick in strengthening the dollar, giving the administration the perception of a backbone AND cow the iranians. the 3rd point is the tricky one of course.

i think the 'surgical strike' to decapitate the leadership, if such a thing actually can be done, is probably the best alternative to varyingly greater degrees of military escalation, up to and including invasion, with bunker busting being the most probable broad-scale military option.

anything to avoid a war w/iran -- where currently the 'new generation' is seemingly very pro-west. a war would change a lot of that sentiment and we'd be back to 1979 with flag burnings in tehran.

mccain could even sing in the senate ....
2009-10-26 19:02:14
Another option?
The Iranian sanctions regime most referred to is cutting off their refined products because even though they produce a mess of oil they have to import refined products.

I suggest we cut off their oil exports, either by embasrgoing them or by destroying their production infrastructure. I don't think that would require Russian cooperation, a problem with import restrictions. We are going to get higher oil prices anyway, so why not deal with it upfront. Without the income from oil, the Iranian government, the mullahs, and the IRG will be in bad straits. It may be that the world's economies can adapt better to expensive oil than the folks running Iran can adapt to a lack of oil money. It might also be true that, for a while, at least, the world price of oil could stabilize at a price not catastrophically higher than now. The world's oil markets would have every incentive to produce and sell as much as possible knowing that the return of Iranian production is in their future. Speculators would be short because of the threat of peace. Well, its a thought!
2009-10-28 20:42:11
War
Yes, it was 1942 and ww2 that got us out of the depression. I think that was what the Bush administration was thinking but Israel has it's own thoughts on Iran and they could drag us into a conflict next year. I don't think this administration wants to see Israel and Iran go at it because it would risk sending the globe into the economic dark ages.
2009-10-28 20:44:00
Another option?
Lets just hope Iran stops with their delay tactics or Israel will do what they feel is in their country's best interest.
2009-10-28 20:46:35
strengthen the dollar with FUD
lol..."bomb, bomb, bomb, bomb bomb Iran". I remember that song well. It could really reverse that pro west sentiment in a big way on any attack. The odds are low of course but risisng that something will happen next year....
2009-10-28 22:01:24
Another option?
Yes, Ron,

And Israel destroying Iranian oil production capacity is clearly Israel's best option!
2009-10-28 23:15:04
Another option?
And that whole region goes up in smoke....
2009-10-29 04:23:19
Another option?
More so than Israel's taking out the nuclear facilities? At least the Iranians would be broke. I'd rather get an agreement with the Iranians, too. And, perhaps, I don't care so much if there is an Iranian nuke. The point is that the Israelis do and it might be easier for Israel to shut down Iranian oil production than to figure out where al the Iranian nuclear facilities are hidden.

The Saudis, the Gulf states (Sunni, I believe), the Russians, et al, get to sell their oil for more money, so maybe they aren't quite so upset after all.

So how does the whole area go up in smoke (other than the burning wells, that is). Seems to me that the Iranians wouldn't have much military capacity without the oil money and besides they would be most interested in getting their oil back on line. The Iranian oil industry is where most of the IRG work, the Mullahs have gotten used to the good life (paid for with oil sales), and we still have a pretty good sized army and navy close at hand.

I think we need to get out of Afghanistan but play hard ball with the Iranians.
2009-10-29 11:08:58
Another option?
The Iranians have the Straight of Hormuz mined and they have excellent guidance systems on their missiles and hate Israel and I'm just saying that it could get ugly. This is obviously not a high probability event right now but things could heat up.
Subject:
Comment:
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.