Comparing the Nikkei and the Nasdaq
Certain market analogs demand attention, including the parallel between Japan's benchmark Nikkei 225 Index and the NASDAQ Composite. Here's why.
Yet certain market analogs demand attention when they're produced by common official policies in addition to the common impulses of common traders, even if those traders themselves are uncommonly good. One of these analogs with Japan, for interest rates at both the long- and short-term horizons, was introduced here last week in Japanese Bond Market: Is US Following Same Path? We can introduce another, the parallel between Japan’s benchmark Nikkei 225 Index and the NASDAQ Composite.
The chart below re-indexes the two markets to their respective bubble peaks, December 29, 1989 for the Nikkei and March 10, 2000 for the NASDAQ; data are displayed at a weekly frequency in local currency terms.

While correlation doesn't imply causality, this is a picture that can really get your attention if for no other reason than the NASDAQ stopped just short of a retracement high made by the Nikkei on the week of April 14, 2000 -- the very date that produced what was then the largest single-day point decline in the US market. The NASDAQ’s retracement needed to reach the week ending June 25, 2010 to complete the parallel in time.
While we cannot say anything certain about the future, we can say things for certain about the past. And unlike assorted baseball players, I'm here to talk about the past: The NASDAQ has failed earlier in time and lower in price than the Nikkei did at a comparable point in its history.
Now comes the real ugly part: If the analog holds, the Nikkei punched down another 61.4% between April 14, 2000 and April 25, 2003. Had anyone actually been in charge at some Japanese equivalent of the Plunge Protection Team or whatever we're calling it these days, they would have tagged on another 0.4% to make for a perfect Fibonacci 61.8% retracement, one that would have set digital tongues a-wagging for many years to come.
Do I see the US following this brutal path lower? No, I don't. Just as noted market commentator and can-do guru Josef Stalin said about police interrogation, “Beat, and beat again until you get the answer,” the central banks have adopted the policy of “print, and print again until no too-big-to-fail bank ever fails again.” The end result of all this will be bloated zombie banks and a transfer of wealth from the private sector to financial institutions, but we'll avoid the sort of market calamities we saw in 2008.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

business news
PRINT



















