Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Why Nasdaq OMX Group Has It Going On


A return to the old uptick format would be great; the modified uptick rule from the SEC would be a mistake.

Editor's Note: The following was posted in real time on our premium Buzz & Banter (click for a free trial).

Nasdaq OMX Group Inc.
(NDAQ) has seen nothing but good news and positive commentary, yet it can't mount any sustained uptrend. Even so, I'm grabbing the root on this name and not letting go as I feel it is so severely undervalued. Nasdaq OMX Group also has one of the most gorgeous balance sheets around.

I feel the biggest thing holding this stock back is the fear of some sort of transaction tax. Additionally, while volumes have increased in the "no uptick world," the sustainability and pricing of those transactions are seriously questionable. A return to the old uptick format would be exceedingly good for Nasdaq OMX Group and NYSE Euronext, Inc. (NYX), even though I'm likely the only one with that view.

I keep hearing rumblings that the SEC is bringing forth the modified uptick rule. I think this is a serious mistake of policy and won't do any good -- in fact, it may be worse than doing nothing as the conditions of the modified uptick rule essentially spell out the rules for the "gaming" of stocks. That is, just short them (a given stock) unfettered until it's down 9.5% (per day) and then move on to the next victim.

In fact, I can see it now -- after a year or so of this rule, we'll see infomercials on how to screen for stocks down 9.5% to 10% to buy for scalps and for stocks down 2% to 3% with volume increasing, you just jump on for the ride down to minus 7% to 9.5%.

If this rule goes into effect I also feel we'll see an even greater disparity in the valuation of large- to mega-large-cap stock versus small- to mid-cap. And this may serve to further constrain capital formation as many innovative companies will stay private, thus avoiding all the difficulties and costs inherent in being publicly traded. This in turn would also hinder job growth and further dampen US competitiveness.

Get Sean's trading ideas and insights, along with Todd Harrison's and 30 other market pros, in real-time. Take a 14 day FREE trial to Minyanville's Buzz & Banter.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
Position in NDAQ

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos