Are Employment Numbers Being Hinged on Weather?

By Mike Mish Shedlock Mar 04, 2010 3:00 pm

You can't take credit for improved numbers in March but blame it on the snow if there's no snapback.



Inquiring minds are investigating the Unemployment Weekly Claims Report for March 4, 2010.
 

In the week ending Feb. 27, the advance figure for seasonally adjusted initial claims was 469,000, a decrease of 29,000 from the previous week's revised figure of 498,000. The 4-week moving average was 470,750, a decrease of 3,500 from the previous week's revised average of 474,250.


Weekly Unemployment Claims



The weekly claims numbers are volatile so it's best to focus on the trend in the four-week moving average. That four-week average hasn't shown any improvement for quite some time.

Four-Week Moving Average of Initial Claims




Four-Week Moving Average of Initial Claims Detail



The four-week moving average of claims for the last three weeks is above where it was on December 12, 2009, and just slightly better than it was on December 5, 2009. By this measure, the recovery has stalled.

Blaming the Weather


A week ago in "Nascent" Recovery or "Nascent" Economic Collapse? I noted how economists were blaming the weather for last week's rise in weekly claims and possible jump in the monthly job report:
 

Weather-Related Questions

I have a few simple questions for...economists now blaming the weather:
 

  • "Did you not know there was a snowstorm on the East coast?"
  • "If you did, then why didn't you factor it in to your estimates?"
  • "How can you be surprised by something you knew?"


Bernanke's "Snow Job"

To refresh your memory, last week Ben Bernanke blamed the weather for the jump in claims and warned about overinterpreting the data.

From Yahoo Finance Jobless Claims Rise Due to Weather-Related Factors:
 

Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke told a congressional committee that the snowstorms are likely to have a short-term -- but not permanent -- effect on unemployment and layoffs. He said policymakers will "have to be careful about not overinterpreting" the upcoming data.

< Previous
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE

Recommendations

MARKETS