Cart (0)
business newsStock Market Seasonality Points to Good December
By
Prieur du Plessis
Dec 02, 2010 8:20 am
Analysis of the historical pattern of monthly returns for the S&P 500 Index over various measurement periods back to 1871.
PRINT
Editor's Note: For more from Prieur du Plessis, visit Investment Postcards.
The first trading day of December was off to a running start, with global stock markets gaining strongly yesterday on positive developments in Europe and upbeat economic data. As a matter of fact, American bourses experienced a so-called 90% up-day. A 90% up-day is defined as a day when upside volume equals 90% or more of the total upside plus downside volume, and points gained equal 90% or more of the total points gained plus points lost. Market breadth was excellent, with many indices bouncing off their key moving averages. Time will tell whether indices have seen their reaction lows (with good follow-through in Asia and Europe as I write). In the meantime, focusing on the S&P 500 Index, I have done a short analysis of the historical pattern of monthly returns for this index over various measurement periods back to 1871. The results are summarized in the graph below.
Source: Plexus Asset Management (based on data from I-Net Bridge)
It's shown that December has historically been a good month, especially when considering the last 50 years. When looking at the periods since 1960, December is vying with April for the month with the largest percentage positive readings.
Source: Plexus Asset Management (based on data from I-Net Bridge)
Where does this leave us? When evaluating valuation levels and the technical outlook for stock markets, one should also take cognizance of seasonality but understand that it is not a stand-alone indicator and it's anybody’s guess whether a specific year will conform to the historical pattern. (After all, November was also supposed to be a good month ...)
The first trading day of December was off to a running start, with global stock markets gaining strongly yesterday on positive developments in Europe and upbeat economic data. As a matter of fact, American bourses experienced a so-called 90% up-day. A 90% up-day is defined as a day when upside volume equals 90% or more of the total upside plus downside volume, and points gained equal 90% or more of the total points gained plus points lost. Market breadth was excellent, with many indices bouncing off their key moving averages. Time will tell whether indices have seen their reaction lows (with good follow-through in Asia and Europe as I write). In the meantime, focusing on the S&P 500 Index, I have done a short analysis of the historical pattern of monthly returns for this index over various measurement periods back to 1871. The results are summarized in the graph below.
Source: Plexus Asset Management (based on data from I-Net Bridge)
It's shown that December has historically been a good month, especially when considering the last 50 years. When looking at the periods since 1960, December is vying with April for the month with the largest percentage positive readings.
Source: Plexus Asset Management (based on data from I-Net Bridge)
Where does this leave us? When evaluating valuation levels and the technical outlook for stock markets, one should also take cognizance of seasonality but understand that it is not a stand-alone indicator and it's anybody’s guess whether a specific year will conform to the historical pattern. (After all, November was also supposed to be a good month ...)
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
