Something's Not Right With Report's Loan Loss Data
By
Mike Mish Shedlock
Sep 01, 2010 9:30 am
Banks in general are sitting on assets, not marked to market, both on and off their balance sheets, for which they have made no loan loss provisions.
Inquiring minds are investigating the FDIC Second Quarter 2010 Quarterly Banking Profile:
Rising net charge-offs are a legitimate reason for loan-loss reserves to decline, but this report shows other interesting things. For example, 61.7% of banks increased loan-loss provisions but total loan-loss reserves declined because "a number of large banks reduced their loss provisions."
Here are a few bank charts to consider.
Wells Fargo (WFC) Daily Chart

Bank of America (BAC) Daily Chart
Quarterly Earnings Are Highest in Almost Three Years
Reductions in loan-loss provisions underscored improvement in asset quality indicators during second quarter 2010. The industry’s quarterly earnings of $21.6 billion are up dramatically from the year-ago loss of $4.4 billion and represent the highest quarterly earnings since third quarter 2007. Almost two out of three institutions (65.5%) reported higher year-over-year quarterly net income. The proportion of institutions reporting quarterly net losses remained high at 20% but was down from more than 29% a year earlier.
Reduced Loan-Loss Provisions Boost Net Income
Insured institutions added $40.3 billion in provisions to their loan-loss allowances in the second quarter. While still high by historic standards, this is the smallest total since the industry set aside $37.2 billion in first quarter 2008 and is $27.1 billion (40.2%) less than the industry’s provisions in second quarter 2009. Fewer than half of all institutions (41.3%) reported year-over-year reductions in quarterly loss provisions. Only 40% of community banks (institutions with less than $1 billion in assets) reported year-over-year declines. Reductions were more prevalent among larger institutions. More than half (56.2%) of institutions with assets greater than $1 billion had lower provisions in the second quarter.
Charge-Offs Fall for First Time Since 2006
Net charge-offs totaled $49 billion in the second quarter, a $214-million (0.4%) decline from a year earlier and the first year-over-year decline since fourth quarter 2006. Charge-offs were lower than a year ago in most major loan categories except for credit cards and real estate loans secured by nonfarm nonresidential properties. Charge-offs on loans to commercial and industrial (C&I) borrowers were $3.1 billion (37.0%) lower than a year ago, while charge-offs on real estate construction and development (C&D) loans were $2.7 billion (34.6%) lower. Charge-offs of one-to-four family residential mortgage loans were down by $1.4 billion (16.0%). Credit card charge-offs were $8.6 billion (86%) higher than in second quarter 2009. Most, if not all, of this increase was attributable to the inclusion of charge-offs on securitized credit card balances, which were not included in reported charge-offs in previous years. The change in reporting was the result of the application of FASB 166 and 167. In contrast, the $1.8 billion (107.2%) year-over-year increase in charge-offs of nonfarm nonresidential real estate loans reflected further deterioration in commercial real estate portfolios. Almost half (49.1%) of insured institutions with more than $1 billion in assets reported lower net charge-offs, while only 43.6% of community banks reported year-over-year declines.
Noncurrent Loans Post First Decline in More than Four Years
The amount of loans and leases that were noncurrent (90 days or more past due or in nonaccrual status) declined by $19.6 billion (4.8%) during the second quarter. This is the first quarterly decline in noncurrent loans since first quarter 2006. Noncurrent levels declined in most major loan categories during the quarter. The sole exception was nonfarm nonresidential real estate loans, where noncurrents increased by $547 million (1.2%), the smallest quarterly increase in three years. The largest reduction in noncurrent loans in the quarter occurred in real estate C&D loans, where noncurrents fell by $5.9 billion (8.3%). This is the third consecutive quarter that noncurrent C&D loans have declined. Noncurrent C&I loans also declined for a third straight quarter, falling by $2.7 billion (7.3%), while noncurrent residential mortgage loans declined by $4.7 billion (2.5%) and noncurrent credit cards fell by $4.2 billion (19%). Slightly fewer than half of all institutions (48.9%) reported declines in their noncurrent loan balances during the quarter. Noncurrent loan balances fell by 5.3% at institutions with more than $1 billion in assets and rose by 0.3% at community banks.
Reserves Fall as Large Banks Reduce Loan-Loss Provisions
Total loan-loss reserves of insured institutions fell for the first time since fourth quarter 2006, declining by $11.8 billion (4.5%), as net charge-offs of $49 billion exceeded loss provisions of $40.3 billion. Almost two out of three institutions (61.7%) increased their loss reserves in the second quarter, but a number of large banks reduced their loss provisions, producing net declines in their reserve balances. In particular, some institutions that converted equity capital into reserves in the first quarter in accordance with the requirements of FASB 166 and 167 reported lower provisioning in the second quarter. Although the industry’s ratio of reserves to total loans fell from 3.51% to 3.40% during the quarter, it's still the second-highest level for this ratio in the 63 years for which data are available. The industry’s “coverage ratio” of reserves to noncurrent loans improved for a second consecutive quarter, from 64.9% to 65.1%, as the reduction in noncurrent loans slightly outpaced the decline in loss reserves.
Rising net charge-offs are a legitimate reason for loan-loss reserves to decline, but this report shows other interesting things. For example, 61.7% of banks increased loan-loss provisions but total loan-loss reserves declined because "a number of large banks reduced their loss provisions."
Here are a few bank charts to consider.
Wells Fargo (WFC) Daily Chart

Bank of America (BAC) Daily Chart
No positions in stocks mentioned.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

VIDEO


















