Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Five Things You Need to Know: End of Days Signs

By

Strange dead animals. Stock market crashes. Sovereign debt downgrades. It feels like the end is nigh.

PrintPRINT
1. End of Days Signs

"And the kings of the earth, and the great men, and the rich men, and the chief captains, and the mighty men, and every bondman, and every free man, hid themselves in the dens and in the rocks of the mountains."
-- Revelations 6:15

The dead white mammal was spotted on a Minnesota county road. It had five claws, long toenails and dark tufts of hair on its back and head. No one could say just what in the hell it was. Some guessed a badger with mange. Others said it was probably a diseased skunk, wolverine or maybe some kind of half-breed pigwolf. Still others whispered it might be the elusive and mythical chupacabra. But on one thing everyone agreed: "It's a strange animal and I hope we don't have anymore around here," Jane Murphy of Alexandria told KSAX TV, giving specific voice and presence to the ultimate fear harbored by all involved.

Strange dead animals. Sovereign debt downgrades. Stock market crashes. The rich are on the run and every bondman is hiding in his den or in the rocks of mountains. These are omens. End days signs. The newspapers and preachers say so.



That's quite a roundup, eh? Grim stuff top to bottom. And all because of a sovereign debt downgrade? No, I don't think so. After all, this is America. Once the credit rating goes we'll steal the appliances, burn the couch, kill the pets and max out all our credit cards in Vegas.

Since Friday I've probably been asked more than two dozen times what this all means. The irony is that we already know what it means. If in July you had asked any voting-age adult to describe what's wrong with America, you would have gotten a list that began somewhere around too much government debt and ended somewhere around too much government spending, with the precise ordering of the contents in between neatly sortable by demographic, age and party affiliation. Which is pretty much exactly the same list you would have gotten had you asked the question in 2001, 1991, 1981 and 1971 for that matter.

Standard & Poor's outlined on Friday afternoon what we've all been thinking for the past 70 years -- the exact duration of the U.S. AAA credit rating, incidentally -- explicitly stating that lowering the rating of U.S. creditworthiness was because the "effectiveness, stability, and predictability of American policymaking and political institutions have weakened at a time of ongoing fiscal and economic challenges." Hey, that's exactly what we've all been saying! For decades!

A U.S. debt downgrade. What a strange dead animal to find in the middle of the road. What can it all mean? Will interest rates go up? Will the dollar go down? Will I pay a higher interest rate on my credit cards? My auto loan? My mortgage? I just saw this headline:

Treasurys Rally as U.S. Debt Remains Go-To Haven

Hahaha. Do you know what that means? It means interest rates are lower, Treasury bonds are rallying as investors seek the safety of Treasury bonds after S&P downgraded Treasury bonds. That's all you need to know about the sovereign debt downgrade.


2. Stumbling From One Debt Crisis to Another


"It seems the world has spent the years since 2008 stumbling from one debt crisis to another," author David Graber wrote Saturday in the Wall Street Journal. "In fact, if we count the Third World debt crisis, which did after all affect most human beings on the planet, the world has been in a continual series of debt crises since the '70s." Indeed.

If the name David Graeber rings a bell maybe it's because you recall I wrote about his excellent new book, Debt: The First 5,000 Years in June. Graeber's anthropology background gives him a unique perspective on debt and the meaning of it in our society, a meaning that is often obscured by how close we are to things. (For example this morning, apparently, many of us believe the sovereign debt downgrade is meaningful.)

"Instead of setting up great overarching institutions designed to protect debtors, we created institutions like the S&P or IMF, essentially, designed instead to protect creditors. It has become increasingly apparent that the system simply doesn't work," Graeber observes. Where does this inevitably lead? One of two probable paths, with the best option the conclusion he hopes for in his book: "It seems to me that we are long overdue for some kind of Biblical-style Jubilee: one that would affect both international debt and consumer debt. It would be salutary not just because it would relieve so much genuine human suffering, but also because it would be our way of reminding ourselves that money is not ineffable, that paying one's debts is not the essence of morality, that all these things are human arrangements and that if democracy is to mean anything, it is the ability to all to agree to arrange things in a different way." The other option is decidedly less attractive for everyone.


3. After the US, Who's Left?

After S&P's downgrade of U.S. debt, who's left on the triple-A rated list of sovereign debt issuers? Not many. But the list may surprise you.

There are 12 countries with CDS rated triple-A:

Switzerland
Norway
Sweden
Finland
Netherlands
Australia
Germany
United Kingdom
Denmark
New Zealand
Austria
France

Wait, France? Really S&P? France? "Yes, we better sit down and take a hard look at U.S. sovereign debt before we even think about France," the review committee apparently said.

Meanwhile, this is what the world looks like through Standard & Poor's ratings lens (via Wikipedia)



  • Green - AAA
  • Turquoise - AA
  • Lighter blue - A
  • Darker blue - BBB
  • Purple - BB
  • Red - B
I kind of like the new turquoise color.

4. Okay, But Is This 2008 All Over Again?

A reader named LB writes:

Hi Kevin,
Always appreciate the insights with respect to Demark indicators. Wondering if you could shed some of your wisdom on the current monthly setup on the SPX versus what was happening back in 2008 before the market tanked in the fall. Similar pattern or different?

LB, that's a very good question.

First, a brief refresher on DeMark indicators. There are two components to TD Sequential and its cousin TD Combo. The prerequisite for a TD Sequential or TD Combo buy or sell signal is what is called the 9-bar TD Setup. TD Setup captures and identifies the momentum phase of a trend that may be beginning by comparing the close of the current bar to the close four price bars earlier. If there are 9 consecutive closes greater (for a sell setup) or less than (for a buy setup) four price bars earlier then we have a completed buy or sell setup. A setup tells us to expect 1-4 bars of correction. Once the setup is in place, the countdown begins. This countdown component identifies the less obvious and less momentum-driven trend in place, and once a 13 is counted we have a buy or sell signal with a duration for the immediate 12 bars. This duration is good for whatever time frame one is considering. Twelve bars after a MONTHLY TD Sequential or TD Combo 13, for example, would be one full year. The response to the exhaustion marked by the 13 typically happens within that 12-bar duration. Finally, unlike the Setup phase the Countdown phase does not require consecutive bars. It simply compares the close to the high or low two price bars earlier until we have 13 closes greater than the high or low two price bars earlier. In this manner it identifies trends that may be more subtle and go undetected in conventional technical analysis.

Okay, with that out of the way, let's revisit the MONTHLY time frame for SPX from 2007 and 2008. The first chart below is SPX from 2005-2009. Below are things to view on this chart.

1. On the left, the 9 in March 2006 identified a TD Sell Setup 9. This warned that we should expect a window of 1-4 months where sellers were in charge.

2. The purple numbers overlapping are the TD Combo count that began in conjunction with the TD Sell Setup 9 that recorded in March 2006. It took a couple of years for this count to eventually complete, but it did so finally in Oct. 2007.

3. Once that Oct. 2007 TD Combo Sell Signal was in place, it warned that we should expect a 12-bar or 12-month window where sellers were again in control of the market due to an exhaustion of buyers.

4. Note the the solid red line (called TDST Down, the DeMark version of a trend line) that was broken a couple of times (Jan. 2008, Mar 2008 and then June 2008). The June 2008 qualified the breakdown whereas the first two breaks did not. This breakdown forecast a serious market trend change in June 2008.

5. Lastly, note the TD Buy Setup 9 that recorded in Feb. 2009. The low in March 2009 was horrifying despite the MONTHLY buy setup in place. I simply point this out when someone asks, "Hey, what if everyone starts following DeMark, will it still work?" Hahaha. Think back to March 2009. I know I was not buying despite this buy setup and it took me almost three full months, until June 3, 2009, to gather up enough courage to say The Time for Bearishness Has Passed.

So that's 2005-2009. Let's look at the more recent chart on a MONTHLY basis to see how similar things are.

1. Once again we have a TD Combo 13 Sell Signal in place from April of this year. We also have a TD 9 Sell Setup that recorded in May. Our window for the sell setup is four bars and extends through September. Our window for the TD Combo Sell Signal extends for another eight months.

2. The key difference, so far, is we have not yet tested or even come near the long-term measure of trend TDST Down, marked by the dashed green line at 1049.33.

3. Shorter-term WEEKLY and DAILY DeMark indicators show selling exhaustion on the DAILY likely Monday, and so far the WEEKLY TDST level at 1219.50 has not been qualified.

Finally, this is the analysis for the index, not the individual stocks that make up a market. Index investors are going to struggle for some time. Individual stock buyers, however, will find more favorable opportunities. That is my long-term thesis. So I look for stocks that do not share the broad market long-term MONTHLY pattern and which have business models not really tied to whether Greece, Italy or Portugal can pay their bills and leave it at that. The economy is not going to materially improve for some time. This is a long-term secular bear that is working its way toward closure, but it will indeed end. And a new secular bull market will begin. I have no idea how much longer that will take, but if pressed to bet I'd say it will begin sooner than is being priced in currently. Buying individual stocks here without leverage is my way of getting a head start on the day when we can once again all be bull market geniuses.

S&P 500 MONTHLY, 2005-2009


Click to enlarge

S&P 500 MONTHLY, 2009 TO PRESENT

Click to enlarge


5. No Cash? So What. The Future of Currency Is Social.

Of course debt downgrades and dollar debasement aside, whatever all that means, it may simply be the case that we move beyond our "filthy lucre" altogether:

Pay With A Tweet is a social payment system that allows users to buy and sell products online with the leveraged values of their social networks. Sellers embed a "Pay With A Tweet" button on their site enabling buyers to log-in to their Twitter or Facebook account and post about the product in exchange for receiving the product.

(via PSFK
)
Follow the markets all day every day with a FREE 14 day trial to Buzz & Banter. Over 30 professional traders share their ideas in real-time. Learn more.
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

PrintPRINT

Busy? Subscribe to our free newsletter!

Submit
 

WHAT'S POPULAR IN THE VILLE