Why the "Economic Recovery" Is a Trap

By Jeffrey Cooper Aug 10, 2009 10:00 am
When stocks explode on dwindling volume and suspect fundamentals, the risk of collapse rises.
  • Share this article:
  • A- A A+
Editor's Note: The following is a free edition of Jeff Cooper's Daily Market Report. For a 2-week trial FREE trial, click here.

Let me live ‘neath your spell
Do do that voodoo that you do so well
"You Do Something To Me," Cole Porter

“Crowds are defined by their shared emotional experiences, but masses are defined by their interpersonal isolation.”
Vincent Price

“All economic movements, by their very nature, are motivated by crowd psychology.”
Bernard Baruch

“In reading the history of nations, we find that, like individuals, they have their whims and their peculiarities; their seasons of excitement and recklessness, when they care not what they do….Money, again, has often been a cause of the delusion of multitudes. Sober nations have all at once become desperate gamblers, and risked almost their existence upon the turn of a piece of paper. Men, it has been well said, think in herds; it will be seen that they go mad in herds, while they only recover their senses slowly, and one by one.”
Preface to Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds, Charles Mackay

Market professionals think that on the whole a profit season that exceeded ‘a honey, I shrunk the expectations landscape’ is likely to be followed better profits instead of lower ones. Either that or they believe that P/E’s will expand. Those are the only two ways for stocks to go up--increased earnings or higher P/E’s.

Or, mania..

Mania (from the Greek meaning “to rage, to be furious") is a condition characterized by extremely elevated mood alternating with episodes of major depression. In Electroboy: A Memoir of Mania, Andy Behrman writes: “When I’m manic, I’m so awake and alert, that my eyelashes fluttering on the pillow sound like thunder… life appears in front of you like an oversized movie screen.”

Mania in an individual magnifies hope and desperation. Mania in a crowd is reinforced. Sigmund Freud’s theory of crowd behavior revolves around the idea that people in a crowd act differently from those who are thinking individually. The mind of a crowd can merge to form a way of thinking. Individual enthusiasm in a crowd is increased as a result.

The mass mind of the market is subject to contagion and control. Fear breeds fear; greed breeds greed; momentum begets momentum. An object once in motion will tend to stay in motion. The question that cannot be ignored is whether purposeful propaganda or a real change in the facts has set the object of mass psychology in motion. Accurate or not, as traders we have to trade the figures given us -- but we don’t have to buy into them hook, line, and sinker.

The more market participants buying in response to the way the news is shaped, the more believable the story becomes, and the more realistic a rally phase appears (and vice versa). It becomes difficult to distance ourselves from the beliefs of the crowd. The more media attention a story receives, the more attractive it is to market participants -- though it may be a mass psychological trap. We tend to attach ourselves to things and people that may be wrong in order to dispel uncertainty: Any attachment, right or wrong, feels better than uncertainty and the unknown.

Right now, fear is running rampant: Portfolio managers fear they're underinvested. Portfolio managers aren't just measured against the performance of the market but are measured on a relative basis against the performance of their competition as well. They do not have the same luxury of patience as individual investors. They're graded, like stocks, on a quarterly basis. Oftentimes, in the midst of a sharp and persistent rally, the fear of having missed the boat can be so overwhelming that it forces money managers to get in.

Of course, individuals may also feel compelled to act when the fear of missing out becomes overwhelming -- but their dirty laundry isn't in public like that of money managers, advisors, and letter-writers.

Often even those that identified a major turning point and recognized the onset of a major rally take profits and become sold-out bulls as the market fails to accommodate with a pullback where they can re-enter.

Often, a persistently aggressive rally will culminate in the capitulation of various camps:

1. Sold-out bulls capitulate to the idea of waiting for a pullback and rush in.

2. Big-picture bears cave in on their thesis, at least for the time being, retrenching to reassess.

This sense of frustration is often characterized by gap to a new high which subsequently elicits a lack of follow through implying that all the buying potential has already been realized.

That being said, significant tops and bottoms are never as unequivocal as a man being shot from a cannon in the circus. You get warnings by way of divergences (descending volume with rising prices and fewer new highs versus new swing highs in the popular averages) but these warnings are often met by disbelief as the market entices us not to heed them by heading higher. The market usually offers a graceful exit, but the precise timing of a top (or bottom) is elusive, leading most players to leave risk to randomness.
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2009 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.



(10)
2009-08-10 12:51:00
comprehensive, full bodied, thoughtful work -
key to me:

"It would be easier for me, of course, to not go out on a limb, but I think you want me to me honest about what I interpret rather than playing it safe...." -

yes! definitely...thank you jeffrey....
2009-08-10 17:22:43
Government Buying Stocks, Or Index Or Index Futures Is Nationalization
Jeffrey,
Great Article
Regarding,"Apparently, these banks promptly went on a buying spree to raise the all-important equity market, so that the US consumer (whose net equity was almost negative on March 31) could have some semblance of confidence back and would go ahead and max out his credit cards. "
If true this means that the nationalized banks are now buying stocks, effectively a partial nationalization of the country. Of course they are probably buying indexes or futures on them, but it would be the same as buying a piece of everyones 401K.
But wouldn't the net effect be to crowd out legitimate investment (oh wait, isn't there record insider selling going on)?
Who would invest in and index or stock market where the government is secretly the puppet master? And how could the banks really function if the government is telling them to buy.

Some things to think about, if this is true.
2009-08-10 19:04:37
Government Buying Stocks, Or Index Or Index Futures Is Nationalization
I don't know if the government is the puppet master. It's been the subject of lively debates on some of the blogs I've read.

I can tell you I decided a while ago now, that between institutional investors and computer analysis and automated purchasing/sells, *the* loser in the game was individual investors. (No government needed in this case...)

I've got a shot *maybe* with individual stocks - on the whole though, I feel better out of the game.
2009-08-10 19:44:04
"Conclusion: Along with the jaws of declining volume versus sharply rising prices, CBOE put/call shows the highest level of bullishness on a down day in 2 and a half years. Sentiment readings reflect the highest level of bulls since the October 2007 peak. The dollar shows signs of making a low while a weaker dollar has been the rallying cry for bulls."

Bad news is good news, and good news is good news. Fundamentals don't matter and technical analysis no longer works. What matters is that somebodies big want this rally to continue.

Now, if you don't cease all this negativity, we're just going to have to report you to flag@whitehouse.gov.
2009-08-10 22:16:53
at last, another soup nazi
I'd been pining for that particular unintelligible jargon. Thanks for throwing it in once again without explanation, very satisfying.
2009-08-11 03:05:30
charts
i see a chart for 20 years it's not adjusted for inflation in 1960 you could redeem a federal reserve note for silver if a multiyear chart is not adjusting for debasing the currency your prices and trend lines are off
2009-08-11 07:03:34
Always with the negative vibes, Moriarity
So, are you trying to tell me that it isn't sustainable for SHLD to trade at 70x earnings? Or that RAD shouldn't increase 30% after reporting, yet another losing quarter? I won't even discuss COF.

We might as well use Graham and Dodd's for a doorstop, because this "rally" has nothing to do with fundamentals. The questions the enterprising options investor must ask are:
1. How long can the gov't continue to pump money into the markets?
2. Which companies are the select list to have their shares jacked to the moon.
2009-08-11 11:01:47
Always with the negative vibes, Moriarity
Well, Japan pumped govt money into their market for more than 10 years. We have made all of their mistakes plus some.... so maybe 15 years?

Cash for clunker toasters and microwaves is next.
2009-08-11 11:04:16
Government Buying Stocks, Or Index Or Index Futures Is Nationalization
Yep.

Sitting on the sidelines is safer.... and more fun.

I am waiting to see how the elections go next year. In the meantime my voting with dollars is restricted to not buying anything from bailout companies... ever.
2009-08-11 18:47:15
Always with the negative vibes, Moriarity
For certain, Cash for Clunkers is welfare designed to benefit lenders, GM, F and their suppliers, but it's not direct gov't participation in the stock market. That kind of intervention has the potential of undermining the entire market. See, whther it's toilet seats or AIG shares, the gov't always pays entirely too much for its purchases.
Subject:
Comment:
Get real-time options trading ideas from Steve Smith, veteran options trader and newsletter author, plus let him show you the way to cut risk and boost your returns through the strategic use of options.  Click here for a free 14 day trial to OptionSmith by Steve Smith.