Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Losses Mount in Birmingham


Alabama county refuses to pay lenders $200 million in margin calls.


Jefferson County, Alabama probably wishes it never heard of an interest rate swap.

The Wall Street Journal reports the county -- home to Birmingham -- has refused to post the $200 million its lenders asked for after losses on its portfolio of interest rate swaps. These derivative contracts enable investors to hedge exposure from interest rate spikes while reducing borrowing costs.

Turmoil in the fixed income markets has hammered the value of the contracts, and the county received what amounts to a margin call on its $5.4 billion swap portfolio. Moody's (MCO) notes Jefferson County has $3.2 billion in debt, and is the only county it's aware of with more interest rate swaps than outstanding bonds. Officials claim the county has no plans to declare bankruptcy, but rating agencies have already started downgrading its debt.

Jefferson County told lenders Bear Stearns (BSC), Bank of America (BAC), JP Morgan (JPM) and Lehman Brothers (LEH) it couldn't post the additional collateral without defaulting on its bond payment obligations. The downgrading of the county's bond insurer, Financial Guarantee Insurance Company, has also pushed its financing costs as high as 10%, up from previous levels of 3% to 4%.

One would think the credit crunch would push counties, states and pension funds to scale back risky investing to preserve capital and safeguard portfolios. But nothing could be further from the truth. South Carolina is looking to capitalize on mortgage market dislocation, the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation is doubling down on U.S. equities and Calpers is jumping on the commodities bandwagon.

If a loss on interest rate swaps for a non-financial firm rings a bell, it should. Back in December Professor Depew noted that CKE Restaurants (CKE) lost $1.8 million on similar swap contracts. "Many companies today," he wrote, "are essentially funds masquerading as businesses." It looks like masquerading isn't just for fast food chains.

< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opin= =3D =3D3D ion about the performance of securities and financial markets by = the wr=3D iter=3D3D s whose articles appear on the site. The views expresse= d by the wri=3D ters are=3D3D not necessarily the views of Minyanville Medi= a, Inc. or members=3D of its man=3D3D agement. Nothing contained on the web= site is intended to con=3D stitute a recom=3D3D mendation or advice address= ed to an individual investor =3D or category of inve=3D3D stors to purchase= , sell or hold any security, or to =3D take any action with re=3D3D spect t= o the prospective movement of the securit=3D ies markets or to solicit t=3D= 3D he purchase or sale of any security. Any inv=3D estment decisions must b= e made =3D3D by the reader either individually or in =3D consultation with = his or her invest=3D3D ment professional. Minyanville write=3D rs and staff= may trade or hold position=3D3D s in securities that are discuss=3D ed in = articles appearing on the website. Wr=3D3D iters of articles are requir=3D = ed to disclose whether they have a position in =3D3D any stock or fund disc= us=3D sed in an article, but are not permitted to disclos=3D3D e the size o= r direct=3D ion of the position. Nothing on this website is intende=3D3D d = to solicit bus=3D iness of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Mi= ny=3D3D anville mana=3D gement and staff as well as contributing writers wi= ll not respo=3D3D nd to em=3D ails or other communications requesting inves= tment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos