Chrysler Debt Stalls Out
Skeptical creditors halt refinancing effort.
Chrysler Financial, the finance unit of privately-held Chrysler LLC, spent the last month in intense negotiations to renew short-term debt such as that used for leases, retail car loans and loans to dealerships.
According to The Wall Street Journal, the company only managed to scrounge up $24 billion - just 80% of the $30 billion it wanted. And the money it did find was expensive: The debt cost Chrysler 1.10% to 2.25% more than the London interbank offered rate (or Libor), as compared to a spread of just 0.30% to 0.50% last year.
Chrysler will likely be forced to pass the additional expense on to customers, making cheap car loans increasingly hard to find.
JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Citigroup (C) and Royal Bank of Scotland worked on behalf of Chysler to renegotiate the loans, but in the end 2 major dissenters wouldn't budge: Bank of America (BAC) and Credit Agricole failed to renew a combined $3 billion in commitments.
Bank of America is already up to its eyeballs in lousy car debt, since it helped lead the refinancing effort for GMAC, finance arm of embattled General Motors (GM).
The financing struggle illustrates not only the lingering effects of the credit crunch, but the extent to which certain big industrial companies are, in Toddo's words, "financials in drag." Included in this list are fellow automaker Ford (F) and massive conglomerate General Electric (GE).
With cheap credit flowing through the financial system, management found it expedient to squeeze income out of balance sheets with aggressive money management. Whether it was tapping the now-collapsed auction-rate securities market or relying on sketchy consumer debt as a profit center (GMAC for GM and WMC Mortgage, a subprime lender, for GE), these so-called industrial behemoths relied heavily on their finance arms for profits.
For carmakers, sales have long depended on cheap and easy financing for would-be buyers. Now those loans are more expensive and harder to come by; revenues are sagging and losses are mounting.
These firms will have to find new ways to turn a profit, or figure out how to do it for less. Of course, that's something their customers are already being forced to do.
The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opin=
=3D =3D3D ion about the performance of securities and financial markets by =
the wr=3D iter=3D3D s whose articles appear on the site. The views expresse=
d by the wri=3D ters are=3D3D not necessarily the views of Minyanville Medi=
a, Inc. or members=3D of its man=3D3D agement. Nothing contained on the web=
site is intended to con=3D stitute a recom=3D3D mendation or advice address=
ed to an individual investor =3D or category of inve=3D3D stors to purchase=
, sell or hold any security, or to =3D take any action with re=3D3D spect t=
o the prospective movement of the securit=3D ies markets or to solicit t=3D=
3D he purchase or sale of any security. Any inv=3D estment decisions must b=
e made =3D3D by the reader either individually or in =3D consultation with =
his or her invest=3D3D ment professional. Minyanville write=3D rs and staff=
may trade or hold position=3D3D s in securities that are discuss=3D ed in =
articles appearing on the website. Wr=3D3D iters of articles are requir=3D =
ed to disclose whether they have a position in =3D3D any stock or fund disc=
us=3D sed in an article, but are not permitted to disclos=3D3D e the size o=
r direct=3D ion of the position. Nothing on this website is intende=3D3D d =
to solicit bus=3D iness of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Mi=
ny=3D3D anville mana=3D gement and staff as well as contributing writers wi=
ll not respo=3D3D nd to em=3D ails or other communications requesting inves=
Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Daily Recap Newsletter