Sorry!! The article you are trying to read is not available now.
Thank you very much;
you're only a step away from
downloading your reports.

Why Jamie Dimon's Thoughts on Chinese Banking Are Valuable


A dug up email provides some inside information.

If I were a prosecutor I'd be thanking Al Gore for inventing the Internet and email (I don't know if Mr. Vice President claimed the email invention, but without the Internet there is no email). Especially email, because now you can amass evidence of wrongdoing in a very searchable and easy-to-use format. has dug up a very interesting email that shows what goes on behind closed doors when the heads of two of the largest US and Spanish banks get together and talk. Not all of it appears to be legal -- there may be collusion and an agreement not to compete for acquisitions.

I get the feeling some laws may have been broken here, but I'm not a lawyer. The comment that really drew my attention wasn't about the collusion, but what the best banker in the country -- Jamie Dimon, the head of JPMorgan (JPM) -- thinks about the Chinese banking system. In this excerpt, an employee who was present at the meeting sums up Jamie's thoughts on China:

Like many others, they are struggling to do business in Asia. Considering to buy a stake in a bank in China and asked if it makes sense to do so at current prices. Jamie replied that the concept is ok, but not now, too expensive, adding that so far "in China it is a one way street" with them wanting to get all and letting you get nothing, and that there will be more and better opportunities when China has a downturn.

Also, too difficult to know what you are buying: many of them do not yet have integrated systems, possibly a meaningful amount of political loans, etc.

[emphasis added]

Jamie is not your typical banker; he doesn't dance (like Chuck Prince) just because the music is playing. His caution, long-term thinking, and contrarianism (he cut off risky lending before everyone else) made JPMorgan a victor in the recent financial meltdown, at least in relative terms. The stock price is still down from the pre-crisis level, but it isn't in single digits or the teens, like Citigroup (C) or Bank of America (BAC). I'd be listening carefully to what he is saying about the soundness of the Chinese banking system.
< Previous
  • 1
Next >
No positions in stocks mentioned.

The information on this website solely reflects the analysis of or opinion about the performance of securities and financial markets by the writers whose articles appear on the site. The views expressed by the writers are not necessarily the views of Minyanville Media, Inc. or members of its management. Nothing contained on the website is intended to constitute a recommendation or advice addressed to an individual investor or category of investors to purchase, sell or hold any security, or to take any action with respect to the prospective movement of the securities markets or to solicit the purchase or sale of any security. Any investment decisions must be made by the reader either individually or in consultation with his or her investment professional. Minyanville writers and staff may trade or hold positions in securities that are discussed in articles appearing on the website. Writers of articles are required to disclose whether they have a position in any stock or fund discussed in an article, but are not permitted to disclose the size or direction of the position. Nothing on this website is intended to solicit business of any kind for a writer's business or fund. Minyanville management and staff as well as contributing writers will not respond to emails or other communications requesting investment advice.

Copyright 2011 Minyanville Media, Inc. All Rights Reserved.

Featured Videos